Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

The effects of zinc oxide non-eugenol and cellulose as periodontal dressings on open wounds after periodontal surgery

Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) · Vol. 53 No. 1 (2020) · hlm. 45–49

DOI
10.20473/j.djmkg.v53.i1.p45-49
ISSN
2442-9740, 1978-3728
Terbit
2020-03-31
Penerbit
Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Background: Periodontal surgery forms a part of periodontal treatment that can sometimes cause open wounds, such as gingivectomy and depigmentation. Unfortunately, the healing process of open wounds can be inhibited due to bacterial infections and systemic factors. Thus, after surgery, the open wounds need to be closed with periodontal dressing. Purpose: This study aims to reveal the differences between using zinc oxide non-eugenol and cellulose periodontal dressings on open wounds after periodontal surgery. Methods: Thirty-two samples were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 16 samples where zinc oxide non-eugenol was applied as a periodontal dressing. Similarly, Group II consisted of 16 samples where cellulose was applied as a periodontal dressing. The dressings were applied to open wounds after periodontal surgery using the split-mouth technique. Hence, zinc oxide non-eugenol was applied on the right side and cellulose was applied on the left side of the mouth. The patients' healing index (HI) score was measured on day seven and their wound healing index (WHI) score was measured on days seven and twenty-one. Results: The day-seven HI score of the wounds applied with cellulose was higher than those applied with zinc oxide non-eugenol. Meanwhile, the WHI of the cellulose group was lower than that of the zinc oxide non-eugenol group, except on day twenty-one. Both the HI and WHI scores then were analysed using Mann Whitney. Conclusion: The application of cellulose is better than zinc oxide non-eugenol on the healing of open wounds after periodontal surgery.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

15 penulis · 23 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 7 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Lambung Mangkurat University
  • Universitas Jember
  • Diponegoro University
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dahlia HerawatiUniversitas Gadjah Mada2
Nurdiana DewiLambung Mangkurat University1
Ivan Arie WahyudiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Sudibyo SudibyoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Marsetyawan HnesUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Suryono SuryonoUniversitas Jember1
Shinta FerronikaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Nungky DevitaningtyasUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
S. SuryonoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Indi KusumawatiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Suryono SuryonoDiponegoro University1
Puspaneka WijayantiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The effects of zinc oxide non-eugenol and cellulose as periodontal dressings on open wounds after periodontal surgery</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Budisidharta, Yoeliani</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Syaify, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Lastianny, Sri Pramestri</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">periodontal dressing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">healing index</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">open wound</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">periodontal surgery</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">wound healing index</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Background: Periodontal surgery forms a part of periodontal treatment that can sometimes cause open wounds, such as gingivectomy and depigmentation. Unfortunately, the healing process of open wounds can be inhibited due to bacterial infections and systemic factors. Thus, after surgery, the open wounds need to be closed with periodontal dressing. Purpose: This study aims to reveal the differences between using zinc oxide non-eugenol and cellulose periodontal dressings on open wounds after periodontal surgery. Methods: Thirty-two samples were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 16 samples where zinc oxide non-eugenol was applied as a periodontal dressing. Similarly, Group II consisted of 16 samples where cellulose was applied as a periodontal dressing. The dressings were applied to open wounds after periodontal surgery using the split-mouth technique. Hence, zinc oxide non-eugenol was applied on the right side and cellulose was applied on the left side of the mouth. The patients' healing index (HI) score was measured on day seven and their wound healing index (WHI) score was measured on days seven and twenty-one. Results: The day-seven HI score of the wounds applied with cellulose was higher than those applied with zinc oxide non-eugenol. Meanwhile, the WHI of the cellulose group was lower than that of the zinc oxide non-eugenol group, except on day twenty-one. Both the HI and WHI scores then were analysed using Mann Whitney. Conclusion: The application of cellulose is better than zinc oxide non-eugenol on the healing of open wounds after periodontal surgery. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga https://fkg.unair.ac.id/en</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-03-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/article/view/11352</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/j.djmkg.v53.i1.p45-49</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi); Vol. 53 No. 1 (2020): March 2020; 45-49</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2442-9740</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-3728</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/MKG/article/view/11352/10257</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi)</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>