Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Utilization of Remote Sensing Techniques for Monitoring and Evaluation of Solo Watershed Management

Forum Geografi · Vol. 17 No. 2 (2004)

DOI
10.23917/forgeo.v17i2.532
ISSN
2460-3945, 0852-0682
Terbit
2004-01-01
Penerbit
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This research is an application of remote sensing technology for monitoring and evaluation of watershed management, which was conducted is Solo Watershed, Central and East Java. The research objectives were 1) to investigate the capability of photomorphic analysis of Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and Enhanced Themmatic Mapper (ETM +) imagery as the basic for analyzes of landforms, landuse, and morphometry of the land surface; 2) to calculate the overland flow – peak discharge and erosion – sediment yield as indicators of land degradation of the area; 3) to use the indicators as set of instrument for monitoring and evaluation of watershed management. In this study, visual interpretation by means of on-screen digilization of the digital imagery was carried out in order to identify and to delineate land parameters using photomorphic approach. Based on the photomorphic analysis, several image – based parameters such as relief topography, physical soil characteristic, litho – stratigraphy, and vegetation cover were integrated with other themati maps in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. Estimation of overland flow (C) based on Cook methods (1942) and calculation of peak disccharge (Qmax) based on rational method (Qmax = C. I. A) were applied. Meanwhile, estimation of surface erosion was carried out using Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE, A = R. K. L. S. CP). The sediment yield (Sy) was estimated using seddiment delivery ratio ( SDR) based on the following formula: Sy = [A + (25% x A)] x SDR. Both pairs of C – Qmax and A – Sy, were utilized as the basis for monitoring and evaluation of the watershed. The combination of C – Qmax and A – Sy were also used as the basis for selection of stream gauge setting / AWLR within particular sub – catchment. It was found that the photomorphic analysis is only color/tone, slope aspects, pattern, and texture, unit boundaries between volcanic – origin landscape (Wilis volcanic complex) and folded – hills landforms (Kendeng ridges) can be delineated. Within the volcanic features, coarse – textured units indicating pyroclastic materials with high drainage density (western part of Lawu volcano). In terms of calculated overland flow and peak discharge of 100 sub – catchment within the Solo Watershed, it was found that there are four sub – catchment with relatively high values ( 0.60 and 1200 m3s1 for overland flow and peak discharge repectively), namely Samin (Karanganyar), Keduang (Wonogiri), Dengkeng (Klaten), and Sungkur (Ponorogo). Five sub-catchment might be categorized as having moderate peak discharge (Qmax ranges from 1000 – 1200 m3s1), namely Ketonggo (Ngawi), Keyang (Ponorogo), Gandong – Semawur (Magetan), Pepe (Boyolali), and Soko (Bojonegoro), while the remaining 91 sub-catchments are categorized as having low peak discharge. Based on the calculation of erosion and sediment yield, there was no sub-catchment with moderate category (60 – 180 ton ha1yr1), i.e. Samin (Karanganyar), Gonggong (Magetan), Ngisip and Kedung Cilik (Tuban), and Pepe (Boyolali). The other 95 sub-catchment might be categorized as gentle to good. In terms of values representing overland flow – flood and erosion – sediment yield, there are several sub-catchments require first priority in monitoring and evaluation, and are recommended as suitable sites for stream gauge setting, i.e. Samin (Karanganyar), Gonggong (Magetan), Ngisip and Kedung Cilik (Tuban).

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

29 penulis · 70 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 2 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Projo DanoedoroUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Bambang SulistyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Suntoro SuntoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Prabang SetyonoSebelas Maret University2
Hartono HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rochmat MartantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
. HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini WidiatiUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Nafiatul UmamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prima WidayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sugeng Juwono MardihusodoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Harjito HarjitoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. MaskuriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muryanto MuryantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afid NurkholisAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurisa Fajri WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sigit Heru MurtiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Widhi HimawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cynthia Permata SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ronggo SadonoUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Ryke NandiniNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Ambar KusumandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
H HartonoSebelas Maret University1
Mugi RahardjoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Maria Theresia Sri BudiastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Imron RosyidiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tjahyo Nugroho AdjiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nugraha Febri RamadhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Utilization of Remote Sensing Techniques for Monitoring and Evaluation of Solo Watershed Management</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Gunawan, Totok</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This research is an application of remote sensing technology for monitoring and evaluation of watershed management, which was conducted is Solo Watershed, Central and East Java. The research objectives were 1) to investigate the capability of photomorphic analysis of Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and Enhanced Themmatic Mapper (ETM +) imagery as the basic for analyzes of landforms, landuse, and morphometry of the land surface; 2) to calculate the overland flow – peak discharge and erosion – sediment yield as indicators of land degradation of the area; 3) to use the indicators as set of instrument for monitoring and evaluation of watershed management. In this study, visual interpretation by means of on-screen digilization of the digital imagery was carried out in order to identify and to delineate land parameters using photomorphic approach. Based on the photomorphic analysis, several image – based parameters such as relief topography, physical soil characteristic, litho – stratigraphy, and vegetation cover were integrated with other themati maps in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. Estimation of overland flow (C) based on Cook methods (1942) and calculation of peak disccharge (Qmax) based on rational method (Qmax = C. I. A) were applied. Meanwhile, estimation of surface erosion was carried out using Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE, A = R. K. L. S. CP). The sediment yield (Sy) was estimated using seddiment delivery ratio ( SDR) based on the following formula: Sy = [A + (25% x A)] x SDR. Both pairs of C – Qmax and A – Sy, were utilized as the basis for monitoring and evaluation of the watershed. The combination of C – Qmax and A – Sy were also used as the basis for selection of stream gauge setting / AWLR within particular sub – catchment. It was found that the photomorphic analysis is only color/tone, slope aspects, pattern, and texture, unit boundaries between volcanic – origin landscape (Wilis volcanic complex) and folded – hills landforms (Kendeng ridges) can be delineated. Within the volcanic features, coarse – textured units indicating pyroclastic materials with high drainage density (western part of Lawu volcano). In terms of calculated overland flow and peak discharge of 100 sub – catchment within the Solo Watershed, it was found that there are four sub – catchment with relatively high values ( 0.60 and  1200 m3s1 for overland flow and peak discharge repectively), namely Samin (Karanganyar), Keduang (Wonogiri), Dengkeng (Klaten), and Sungkur (Ponorogo). Five sub-catchment might be categorized as having moderate peak discharge (Qmax ranges from 1000 – 1200 m3s1), namely Ketonggo (Ngawi), Keyang (Ponorogo), Gandong – Semawur (Magetan), Pepe (Boyolali), and Soko (Bojonegoro), while the remaining 91 sub-catchments are categorized as having low peak discharge. Based on the calculation of erosion and sediment yield, there was no sub-catchment with moderate category (60 – 180 ton ha1yr1), i.e. Samin (Karanganyar), Gonggong (Magetan), Ngisip and Kedung Cilik (Tuban), and Pepe (Boyolali). The other 95 sub-catchment might be categorized as gentle to good. In terms of values representing overland flow – flood and erosion – sediment yield, there are several sub-catchments require first priority in monitoring and evaluation, and are recommended as suitable sites for stream gauge setting, i.e. Samin (Karanganyar), Gonggong (Magetan), Ngisip and Kedung Cilik (Tuban).</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2004-01-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/532</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.23917/forgeo.v17i2.532</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Forum Geografi; Vol 17, No 2 (2003)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-3945</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0852-0682</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/532/321</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2015 Forum Geografi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>