Study on Runoff Debit in the Catchment Area of Waduk Gajah Mungkur Wonogiri

Anna, Alif Noor; Priyana, Yuli

doi:10.23917/forgeo.v6i2.395

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Study on Runoff Debit in the Catchment Area of Waduk Gajah Mungkur Wonogiri

Forum Geografi · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016) · hlm. 42–60

DOI: 10.23917/forgeo.v6i2.395
ISSN: 2460-3945, 0852-0682
Terbit: 2016-12-20
Penerbit: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Bahasa: eng
Lisensi: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Abstrak

AbstractWater resource is one of natural resources, that is very vital. It needed to be used and to be kept throughly. For those purposes need good and directed plan, in which one of the basic component of it plan have to be supported by available a complete hydrological data and it analysis. One of hydrological data analysis is to estimate runoff of catchement area, which can be used for planning the hydrologi construction. This research aim: 1) to calculate the run off discharge by thornwaite Mather Method, monthly, annualy, and the average on the catchment through a sample of Keduang, Temon, Alang, and Wuryantoro areas; 2) to analyze the difference of the run off discharge (at no. 1) by observation resulted from trend analysis. Based on the calculation, it appears, thornwaite-mather method showed that high discharge (moreover limit 0) in dry month. From the research result, it appears, that calculation discharge graphic had lower differentation than observation discharge graphic. From sample of catchment areas that have been investigated, from the highest to the lowest deviation was Wuryantoro catchment area (78,8%), Temon catchment area (47,38%), Alang catchment area (46,45%), and Keduang catchment area (24,98%) respectively). The condition like above caused by intervation of man. Not only did he influence vegetatively, but he influenced technically as well. From these conservation, technical conservation (flood and construction and reservoir) was the highest influence to run off discharge calculation. The run off discharge that was calculated by thornthwite-Mather Method based on air temperate, rainy, altitude, and water holding capacity only, but groundwater supply didn’t be calculated.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

22 penulis · 54 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
IPB University
Afiliasi tidak diketahui

Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel

Tampilkan sebagai tabel

Rekan penulis	Organisasi	Artikel bersama
Retno Woro Kaeksi	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	6
Kuswaji Dwi Priyono	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	6
Suharjo Suharjo	Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang	4
Priyono Priyono	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	4
Agus Anggoro Sigit	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	3
S Suharjo	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	3
Sugiharto Budi Santoso	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	3
Rohman Hakim	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	2
Munawar Cholil	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	2
Jumadi Jumadi	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Riani Laviati	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Choirul Amin	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Arif Jauhari	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
T Taryono	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Taryono Taryono	IPB University	1
Wahyuni Apri Astuti	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Retno Woro Kaeks	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Dina Safriningsih	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Suyono Suyono	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Soenarso Simoen	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.

Metadata asli (oai_dc)

<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Study on Runoff Debit in the Catchment Area of Waduk Gajah Mungkur Wonogiri</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Anna, Alif Noor</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Priyana, Yuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">AbstractWater resource is one of natural resources, that is very vital. It needed to be used and to be kept throughly. For those purposes need good and directed plan, in which one of the basic component of it plan have to be supported by available a complete hydrological data and it analysis. One of hydrological data analysis is to estimate runoff of catchement area, which can be used for planning the hydrologi construction. This research aim: 1) to calculate the run off discharge by thornwaite Mather Method, monthly, annualy, and the average on the catchment through a sample of Keduang, Temon, Alang, and Wuryantoro areas; 2) to analyze the difference of the run off discharge (at no. 1) by observation resulted from trend analysis. Based on the calculation, it appears, thornwaite-mather method showed that high discharge (moreover limit 0) in dry month. From the research result, it appears, that calculation discharge graphic had lower differentation than observation discharge graphic. From sample of catchment areas that have been investigated, from the highest to the lowest deviation was Wuryantoro catchment area (78,8%), Temon catchment area (47,38%), Alang catchment area (46,45%), and Keduang catchment area (24,98%) respectively). The condition like above caused by intervation of man. Not only did he influence vegetatively, but he influenced technically as well. From these conservation, technical conservation (flood and construction and reservoir) was the highest influence to run off discharge calculation. The run off discharge that was calculated by thornthwite-Mather Method based on air temperate, rainy, altitude, and water holding capacity only, but groundwater supply didn’t be calculated.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2016-12-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/395</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.23917/forgeo.v6i2.395</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Forum Geografi; Vol 6, No 2 (1992): December 1992; 42-60</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2460-3945</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0852-0682</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/395/3060</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2015 Forum Geografi</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>