Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

Digital Movement of Opinion #BLACKLIVESMATTER in Creating Public Opinion About Black Lives Matter

Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (JKISKI) · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 39–48

DOI
10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.726
ISSN
2503-0795, 2548-8740
Published
2023-06-25
Publisher
Jurnal Komuniksi ISKI
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

#BlackLivesMatter is still used by netizens to express opinions about the Black Lives Matter movement which is still developing today. In April 2021, the court ruled for Derek Chauvin, the police officer who shot George Floyd. In addition, there are still many shootings of black citizens in the United States and various other countries. This study aims to determine the spread of #BlackLivesMastter and public opinion on Twitter during 20 – 27 April 2021 regarding Black Lives Matter. This research uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative method is used to see the distribution of 2,500 sample tweets using Netlytic.org and Gephi. The qualitative method is conducted to analyze public opinion about Black Lives Matter. The theory used is Computer-Mediated Communication, Public Space, and Critical Discourse Analysis. The results showed that opinions were dominated by positive opinions with 71.76%, negative opinions with 13.08% and irrelevant opinions with 15.16%. The positive opinions are dominant because they have succeeded in creating empathy, anger, and criticism, have political interests, and are voiced by political elite accounts, media, NGOs, and celebrities. Negative opinions are voiced by two main political elites and Twitter users who are not well known so they are considered personal opinions. Irrelevant opinions are voiced by Twitter users in more private spaces and are used to attract public attention.

Collaboration network of the authors

9 authors · 20 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Gunadarma University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Noviawan Rasyid OhorellaGunadarma University2
Atit PertiwiGunadarma University2
Suryarini WidodoGunadarma University2
Rio Setia MonataGunadarma University2
Yusuf MaulanaGunadarma University2
Dwi HaryantiGunadarma University1
Ainun Rahma YusufinaGunadarma University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2503-0795/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Digital Movement of Opinion #BLACKLIVESMATTER in Creating Public Opinion About Black Lives Matter</dc:title><dc:creator>Ramadhani, Rizky Wulan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Prihantoro, Edy</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;#BlackLivesMatter is still used by netizens to express opinions about the Black Lives Matter movement which is still developing today. In April 2021, the court ruled for Derek Chauvin, the police officer who shot George Floyd. In addition, there are still many shootings of black citizens in the United States and various other countries. This study aims to determine the spread of #BlackLivesMastter and public opinion on Twitter during 20 – 27 April 2021 regarding Black Lives Matter. This research uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative method is used to see the distribution of 2,500 sample tweets using Netlytic.org and Gephi. The qualitative method is conducted to analyze public opinion about Black Lives Matter. The theory used is Computer-Mediated Communication, Public Space, and Critical Discourse Analysis. The results showed that opinions were dominated by positive opinions with 71.76%, negative opinions with 13.08% and irrelevant opinions with 15.16%. The positive opinions are dominant because they have succeeded in creating empathy, anger, and criticism, have political interests, and are voiced by political elite accounts, media, NGOs, and celebrities. Negative opinions are voiced by two main political elites and Twitter users who are not well known so they are considered personal opinions. Irrelevant opinions are voiced by Twitter users in more private spaces and are used to attract public attention.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Jurnal Komuniksi ISKI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-06-25</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.726</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.726</dc:identifier><dc:source>Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia; Vol 8 No 1 (2023); 39-48</dc:source><dc:source>2503-0795</dc:source><dc:source>2548-8740</dc:source><dc:relation>http://www.jurnal-iski.or.id/index.php/jkiski/article/viewFile/726/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>