Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

Does Risk Perception and Knowledge of Covid-19 Correspond with Vaccination Decision?

Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (JKISKI) · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 228–238

DOI
10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.843
ISSN
2503-0795, 2548-8740
Published
2023-06-29
Publisher
Jurnal Komuniksi ISKI
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This research examines the correlation between perception of risk of Covid-19 and knowledge of Covid-19 to reach vaccination decisions. A number of researches have shown that among many factors that are associated with people’s decision to get vaccinated are the perception of how vulnerable are they to be infected by the virus and the perception of how severe is the impact of the virus on them as well as how knowledgeable are they about the disease being prevented. This research aims to investigate the same finding in the context of a group of respondents in Indonesia. With the online survey that collected data of more than three hundred research participants, the result of the data analysis in this research, however, does not corroborate the finding in the previous research. Part of the possible explanation is the approach to drive the vaccination through the implementation of the vaccine mandate. The policy of vaccine mandate in Indonesia was implemented since the vaccine was first available in the country. The proof of vaccination was used as a requirement to have access to public transportations and other public services. This vaccine mandate continued progressively to the second and even third or booster vaccination. This policy of mandatory vaccination became an approach to increase vaccine uptake, which was rather different from other vaccinations that allow some room for voluntary choices.

Collaboration network of the authors

7 authors · 12 co-authorship links · 3 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Diponegoro University
  • State University of Jakarta
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nurul HasfiDiponegoro University1
Triyono LukmantoroDiponegoro University1
Sandy AllifiansyahState University of Jakarta1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2503-0795/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Does Risk Perception and Knowledge of Covid-19 Correspond with Vaccination Decision?</dc:title><dc:creator>Manalu, Rouli</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pradekso, Tandiyo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Setyabudi, Djoko</dc:creator><dc:creator>Budiarsa, Yohanes Thianika</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This research examines the correlation between perception of risk of Covid-19 and knowledge of Covid-19 to reach vaccination decisions. A number of researches have shown that among many factors that are associated with people’s decision to get vaccinated are the perception of how vulnerable are they to be infected by the virus and the perception of how severe is  the impact of the virus on  them as well as how knowledgeable are they about  the disease being prevented. This research aims to investigate the same finding in the context of a group of respondents in Indonesia. With the online survey that collected data of more than three hundred research participants, the result of the data analysis in this research, however, does not corroborate the finding in the previous research. Part of the possible explanation is the approach to drive the vaccination through the implementation of the vaccine mandate. The policy of vaccine mandate in Indonesia was implemented since the vaccine was first available in the country. The proof of vaccination was used as a requirement to have access to public transportations and other public services. This vaccine mandate continued progressively to the second and even third or booster  vaccination. This policy of mandatory vaccination became an approach to increase vaccine uptake, which was rather different from other vaccinations that allow some room for voluntary choices.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Jurnal Komuniksi ISKI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-06-29</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.843</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.843</dc:identifier><dc:source>Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia; Vol 8 No 1 (2023); 228-238</dc:source><dc:source>2503-0795</dc:source><dc:source>2548-8740</dc:source><dc:relation>http://www.jurnal-iski.or.id/index.php/jkiski/article/viewFile/843/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>