This study discusses a dispute between the Press Council (DP) and the National Board for Profession Certification (BNSP) over the authority to conduct journalist competency tests (UKW) using Hans Kelsen’s and Hans Kaviasky’s Theory of Hierarchy of Law. This research was conducted through a qualitative approach using a normative judicial method in analyzing the Constitutional Court’s Decision No.38/PPU-XIX/2021 concerning the authority to conduct journalist competency tests. Secondary data of this research was obtained through literature and document studies. This research found that there has been no final clarification on the settlement of the legal dispute between DP and BNSP over the authority to conduct journalist competency tests following the Constitutional Court’s Decision No. 38/PPU-XIX/2021 rejecting in full the applicants’ plea. The legal implication of the decision is that both DP and BNSP can continue to conduct journalist competency tests respectively.
Collaboration network of the authors
13 authors ·
17 co-authorship links
· 10 across different organisations
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Gunadarma University
STIKOM InterStudi
Mercu Buana University
Multimedia Nusantara University
Medan Area University
Universitas Airlangga
Universitas Jember
Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.