Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

Framing Analysis of the South China Sea News Conflict in the Malay Media

Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (JKISKI) · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025) · pp. 309–321

DOI
10.25008/jkiski.v10i2.1218
ISSN
2503-0795, 2548-8740
Published
2025-12-07
Publisher
Jurnal Komuniksi ISKI
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This study examines the South China Sea conflict involving countries in the region. However, it is not limited to those bordering the South China Sea because other superpower countries are also involved, such as the US, Britain, Germany, Canada, Australia, India. The conflict garnered serious attention from Malay media such as kompas.com (Indonesia), bharian.com.my (Malaysia) and mediamediapermata.com (Brunei). This study sought to inspect how Malay media frame the South China Sea conflict using a qualitative-descriptive approach. Using Entman’s model, it focused on root causes, problem causes, moral judgments, and recommendations. As a result, the three media saw China's claims to the South Sea and its abundant natural resources as the root of the problem. Bharian.com.my added that another root of the problem is China's hegemony in the South Seas. For causes of the problem, they agreed on China’s over-aggression and their patrol warships in the South China Sea. In addition, kompas.com and bharian.com added China's policy requiring foreign ships to report if they pass into the South China Sea. Furthermore, kompas.com also saw the different interests of ASEAN countries and the formation of the AUKUS alliance as the cause of the problem. In terms of moral judgments, they agreed on the need to maintain peace, order and security in the South China Sea. As for the recommendation aspect, they encourage compliance with UN conventions. Then, kompas.com and bharian.com.my also considered the importance of diplomacy at the negotiating table.

Collaboration network of the authors

6 authors · 9 co-authorship links · 5 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • IPB University
  • Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sumardjo SumardjoIPB University1
Sarwititi SarwoprasodjoIPB University1
Ninuk PurnaningsihIPB University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2503-0795/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Framing Analysis of the South China Sea News Conflict in the Malay Media</dc:title><dc:creator>Das'ad Latif</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ramli, Muhammad Ruslan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ballian Siregar</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This study examines the South China Sea conflict involving countries in the region. However, it is not limited to those bordering the South China Sea because other superpower countries are also involved, such as the US, Britain, Germany, Canada, Australia, India. The conflict garnered serious attention from Malay media such as kompas.com (Indonesia), bharian.com.my (Malaysia) and mediamediapermata.com (Brunei). This study sought to inspect how Malay media frame the South China Sea conflict using a qualitative-descriptive approach. Using Entman’s model, it focused on root causes, problem causes, moral judgments, and recommendations. As a result, the three media saw China's claims to the South Sea and its abundant natural resources as the root of the problem. Bharian.com.my added that another root of the problem is China's hegemony in the South Seas. For causes of the problem, they agreed on China’s over-aggression and their patrol warships in the South China Sea. In addition, kompas.com and bharian.com added China's policy requiring foreign ships to report if they pass into the South China Sea. Furthermore, kompas.com also saw the different interests of ASEAN countries and the formation of the AUKUS alliance as the cause of the problem. In terms of moral judgments, they agreed on the need to maintain peace, order and security in the South China Sea. As for the recommendation aspect, they encourage compliance with UN conventions. Then, kompas.com and bharian.com.my also considered the importance of diplomacy at the negotiating table.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Jurnal Komuniksi ISKI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-12-07</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v10i2.1218</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.25008/jkiski.v10i2.1218</dc:identifier><dc:source>Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia; Vol 10 No 2 (2025); 309-321</dc:source><dc:source>2503-0795</dc:source><dc:source>2548-8740</dc:source><dc:relation>https://mail.jurnal-iski.or.id/index.php/jkiski/article/download/1218/384</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>