Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Efficient YOLO-based models for real-time ceramic crack detection

IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 852–860

DOI
10.11591/ijai.v15.i1.pp852-860
ISSN
2252-8938, 2089-4872
Terbit
2026-02-01
Penerbit
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The following research work systematically compares four variants of you only look once (YOLO), namely, YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and YOLOv11 proposed recently, considering the key properties required to perform ceramic surface crack detection tasks with high computational efficiency, real-time inference speed, and low memory usage. A total of 300 images of ceramic surfaces were collected with manually labeled cracks and divided into training, validation, and testing sets in portions of 263, 22, and 15 images, respectively. Each of the four YOLO variants was trained for 50 and 100 epochs, and each was evaluated regarding mean average precision (mAP), inference time, model size, and computational complexity in giga floating point operations per second (GFLOPs). YOLOv9 produced the highest accuracy with mAP values as high as 0.752-0.79 but the highest cost in terms of increased computational complexity. However, among these methods, YOLOv8 can produce the fastest inference (~2-2.3 ms) with a small memory footprint (~6 MB) with an acceptable accuracy of ~0.65-0.67. The results showed that YOLOv8 is the most feasible to deploy in resource constrained industrial automation environments. By offering this comparative study, the research attempts to provide hints for the selection of appropriate YOLO-based models by practitioners in quality control applications related to ceramic manufacturing.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

19 penulis · 46 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 24 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Rajamangala University of Technology
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Phranakhon Rajabhat University
  • Institut Teknologi Dan Bisnis STIKOM Bali
  • Sanata Dharma University
  • University of Newcastle Australia
  • Guizhou University of Engineering Science
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yamin ThweRajamangala University of Technology5
Evi TriandiniInstitut Teknologi Dan Bisnis STIKOM Bali4
Elang ParikesitRajamangala University of Technology2
I Komang Agus Ady AryantoRajamangala University of Technology2
Yuri PamungkasInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Petrus SutyasadiSanata Dharma University1
Nipat JongsawatRajamangala University of Technology1
Anucha TungkasthanRajamangala University of Technology1
Ratri Dwi IndrianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuri PamungkasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Stralen PratasikInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Made KrisnandaUniversity of Newcastle Australia1
Gao YulanGuizhou University of Engineering Science1
Myo Min AungRajamangala University of Technology1
Abdul KarimHallym University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Efficient YOLO-based models for real-time ceramic crack detection</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Maungmeesri, Benchalak</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Khonthon, Sasithorn</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Maneetham, Dechrit</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Crisnapati, Padma Nyoman</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US"></dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Ceramic crack detection; Low-memory devices; Object detection; Real-time processing; You only look once</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The following research work systematically compares four variants of you only look once (YOLO), namely, YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, and YOLOv11 proposed recently, considering the key properties required to perform ceramic surface crack detection tasks with high computational efficiency, real-time inference speed, and low memory usage. A total of 300 images of ceramic surfaces were collected with manually labeled cracks and divided into training, validation, and testing sets in portions of 263, 22, and 15 images, respectively. Each of the four YOLO variants was trained for 50 and 100 epochs, and each was evaluated regarding mean average precision (mAP), inference time, model size, and computational complexity in giga floating point operations per second (GFLOPs). YOLOv9 produced the highest accuracy with mAP values as high as 0.752-0.79 but the highest cost in terms of increased computational complexity. However, among these methods, YOLOv8 can produce the fastest inference (~2-2.3 ms) with a small memory footprint (~6 MB) with an acceptable accuracy of ~0.65-0.67. The results showed that YOLOv8 is the most feasible to deploy in resource constrained industrial automation environments. By offering this comparative study, the research attempts to provide hints for the selection of appropriate YOLO-based models by practitioners in quality control applications related to ceramic manufacturing.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2026-02-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/article/view/28728</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijai.v15.i1.pp852-860</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI); Vol 15, No 1: February 2026; 852-860</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8938</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4872</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijai.v15.i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/article/view/28728/14985</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://ijai.iaescore.com/index.php/IJAI/article/downloadSuppFile/28728/4385</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Benchalak Maungmeesri, Sasithorn Khonthon, Dechrit Maneetham, Padma Nyoman Crisnapati</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>