Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

The BANI Framework and Indonesian Diplomatic Communication: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (JKISKI) · Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 189–199

DOI
10.25008/emm0v541
ISSN
2503-0795, 2548-8740
Published
2026-06-04
Publisher
Jurnal Komuniksi ISKI
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This study highlights the discourse constructed by the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) in demonstrating its role through digital diplomacy. Through these efforts, MoFA Indonesia adapts a digital diplomacy strategy to maintain public trust and national stability amidst global fragility and anxiety. The purpose of this study is to analyze the contemporary diplomatic communication forms of MoFA Indonesia in building cooperation between countries and the crisis communication strategies implemented through its official YouTube channel. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study research type. The analytical technique used is critical discourse analysis with the Fairclough approach. This study examines MoFA Indonesia's video content related to the context of crises and bilateral cooperation. The analysis results show that MoFA Indonesia implements a two-track communication strategy: reactive diplomacy and proactive diplomacy. Reactive diplomacy is carried out in crisis situations to calm public anxiety and demonstrate state control. Meanwhile, proactive diplomacy is carried out in the realm of bilateral cooperation to build long-term resilience against global uncertainty. Both utilize digital platforms to control the narrative, target multiple audiences, and project the state's competence. Theoretically, this study expands digital diplomacy literature by establishing the BANI (Brittle, Anxious, Non-linear, and Incomprehensible) framework as a superior analytical tool for mapping state communicative responses to non-linear and incomprehensible global disruptions, providing a deeper conceptual understanding of narrative resilience beyond the conventional VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity) paradigm.

Collaboration network of the authors

2 authors · 1 co-authorship link · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Dian Nusantara
  • Multimedia Nusantara University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2503-0795/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>The BANI Framework and Indonesian Diplomatic Communication: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs</dc:title><dc:creator>Putranto, Algooth</dc:creator><dc:creator>Syafuddin, Khairul</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This study highlights the discourse constructed by the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) in demonstrating its role through digital diplomacy. Through these efforts, MoFA Indonesia adapts a digital diplomacy strategy to maintain public trust and national stability amidst global fragility and anxiety. The purpose of this study is to analyze the contemporary diplomatic communication forms of MoFA Indonesia in building cooperation between countries and the crisis communication strategies implemented through its official YouTube channel. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study research type. The analytical technique used is critical discourse analysis with the Fairclough approach. This study examines MoFA Indonesia's video content related to the context of crises and bilateral cooperation. The analysis results show that MoFA Indonesia implements a two-track communication strategy: reactive diplomacy and proactive diplomacy. Reactive diplomacy is carried out in crisis situations to calm public anxiety and demonstrate state control. Meanwhile, proactive diplomacy is carried out in the realm of bilateral cooperation to build long-term resilience against global uncertainty. Both utilize digital platforms to control the narrative, target multiple audiences, and project the state's competence. Theoretically, this study expands digital diplomacy literature by establishing the BANI (Brittle, Anxious, Non-linear, and Incomprehensible) framework as a superior analytical tool for mapping state communicative responses to non-linear and incomprehensible global disruptions, providing a deeper conceptual understanding of narrative resilience beyond the conventional VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity) paradigm.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Jurnal Komuniksi ISKI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-06-04</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.25008/emm0v541</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.25008/emm0v541</dc:identifier><dc:source>Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia; Vol 11 No 1 (2026); 189-199</dc:source><dc:source>2503-0795</dc:source><dc:source>2548-8740</dc:source><dc:relation>https://www.jurnal-iski.or.id/index.php/jkiski/article/download/1436/428</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>