Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 545–552

DOI
10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20796
ISSN
2620-5440, 2252-8822
Terbit
2021-06-01
Penerbit
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

This study aimed to: 1) Produce higher order thinking skill (HOTS) assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history; 2) Know the validity of HOTS assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history; 3) Find out the characteristics of HOTS questions in learning Indonesian history. This study employed the research and development method of the Borg and Gall model. The HOTS test item was conducted on 36 students in class XI of 2 Ngaglik State Senior High School. Data analysis includes tests of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing features and deception index. The study found: 1) The HOTS assessment instrument of multiple-choice questions consisted of 25 items; 2) The results of the HOTS question validation by two Indonesian history learning assessment experts on the material, construction and language aspects were valid and appropriate. The results of the validation by three Indonesian history teachers also stated that the assessment instruments were valid and appropriate; 3) The characteristics of HOTS questions had fulfilled the validity criteria of 23 questions, reliability with a coefficient of 0.97 (very strong), the average difficulty level is 0.33 (moderate), the average differentiation test is 0.42 (good), and the average deception index is 0.56 (good).

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 115 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 4 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Maharshi Dayanand University
  • Politeknik Statistika STIS
  • Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • State University of Makassar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Muhammad Rijal FadliAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Taat WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Ajat SudrajatUniversitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta2
Lia YulianaPoliteknik Statistika STIS2
Nanda SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ofianto OfiantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Tri Zahra NingsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Surya Aymanda NababanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Zul AsriAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Kian AmboroAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Kuswono KuswonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rajender Singh ChhillarMaharshi Dayanand University1
Ira Galih PrabasariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Winny Laura Christina HutagalungAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fetty Febriasti BaharAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Niken Pusparani PermataAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sekar Purbarini KawuryanYogyakarta State University1
Suminto A SayutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Leli YulifarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rhoma Dwi Aria YuliantriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Miftahuddin MiftahuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lukman NadjamuddinState University of Makassar1
Muhammad ZakyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
WindayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Idrus RoreAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wilman LumanginoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurgan TadekoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adi SuryantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahmat FadhliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fery Muhamad FirdausAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurtanio Agus PurwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Myristica ImanitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suranto Aw.Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zamroni ZamroniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurizky HandayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bunari BunariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Setiawan, Johan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ajat Sudrajat, Ajat</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Aman, Aman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kumalasari, Dyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Assessment instruments; Higher order thinking skill; Indonesian history learning</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aimed to: 1) Produce higher order thinking skill (HOTS) assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history; 2) Know the validity of HOTS assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history; 3) Find out the characteristics of HOTS questions in learning Indonesian history. This study employed the research and development method of the Borg and Gall model. The HOTS test item was conducted on 36 students in class XI of 2 Ngaglik State Senior High School. Data analysis includes tests of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, distinguishing features and deception index. The study found: 1) The HOTS assessment instrument of multiple-choice questions consisted of 25 items; 2) The results of the HOTS question validation by two Indonesian history learning assessment experts on the material, construction and language aspects were valid and appropriate. The results of the validation by three Indonesian history teachers also stated that the assessment instruments were valid and appropriate; 3) The characteristics of HOTS questions had fulfilled the validity criteria of 23 questions, reliability with a coefficient of 0.97 (very strong), the average difficulty level is 0.33 (moderate), the average differentiation test is 0.42 (good), and the average deception index is 0.56 (good).</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US">Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2021-06-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/20796</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20796</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE); Vol 10, No 2: June 2021; 545-552</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-5440</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8822</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijere.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/20796/13146</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>