Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Context input process product evaluation of hybrid learning practices in Indonesian universities

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024) · hlm. 475–487

DOI
10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26588
ISSN
2620-5440, 2252-8822
Terbit
2024-02-01
Penerbit
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

The transformation of post-pandemic learning at Indonesian universities is becoming increasingly diverse. Several universities use hybrid learning models to implement hybrid learning practices. The purpose of this study is to assess the hybrid learning process at two Indonesian universities. The context input process product (CIPP) evaluation model is used in this study as part of a mixed method. Quantitative methods are used to get an overview of student and lecturer responses, whereas qualitative methods are used to dig deeper into data about hybrid learning practices. This study included 341 students and 22 lecturers from both universities. Techniques for collecting data include questionnaires, interviews, observation, and documentation studies. The data was analyzed using learning theories. The study’s findings indicate that hybrid learning practices are performing well. The readiness of university infrastructure, as well as the readiness of students and lecturers, determines the success of hybrid learning implementation. In practice, however, some lecturers tend to use face-to-face or online learning practices exclusively to fill gaps in the hybrid learning process. This study suggests that universities investigate an effective model for implementing hybrid learning.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 104 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 47 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Tadulako University
  • Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Indonesia Open University
  • The University of Melbourne
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Lantip Diat PrasojoYogyakarta State University5
Johan SetiawanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Metro4
Aris SuharyadiYogyakarta State University4
Ajat SudrajatYogyakarta State University3
Awanis AkaliliYogyakarta State University3
Muhammad Rijal FadliYogyakarta State University3
Cecep IbrahimUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Sekar Purbarini KawuryanYogyakarta State University2
Meilina BustariYogyakarta State University2
Irwan RisuhawiantoYogyakarta State University1
Wiwik WijayantiYogyakarta State University1
Widia Murni WijayaYogyakarta State University1
Widiawati WidiawatiUniversitas Negeri Padang1
Muthahharah ThahirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mochamad Fadlani SalamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aulia Asyifani PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suminto A. SayutiYogyakarta State University1
Leli YulifarIndonesia University of Education1
Rhoma Dwi Aria YuliantriYogyakarta State University1
Miftahuddin MiftahuddinUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau1
Muhammad ZakySunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Lukman NadjamuddinTadulako University1
Idrus A. RoreTadulako University1
WindayantiTadulako University1
Wilman LumanginoTadulako University1
Nurgan TadekoTadulako University1
Rian VebriantoUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau1
Aan KomariahIndonesia University of Education1
Hasyim Asy’ariUniversitas KH Abdul Chalim1
ZahruddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Annisa SilvianiSyarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta1
Dyah KumalasariYogyakarta State University1
Nanda SaputraSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Al-Hilal Sigli1
Ofianto OfiantoUniversitas Negeri Padang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Context input process product evaluation of hybrid learning practices in Indonesian universities</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Suryanto, Adi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Aman, Aman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yuliana, Lia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Purwanto, Nurtanio Agus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Firdaus, Fery Muhamad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fadhli, Rahmat</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">CIPP evaluation; Higher education; Hybrid learning; Online learning; Readiness</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The transformation of post-pandemic learning at Indonesian universities is becoming increasingly diverse. Several universities use hybrid learning models to implement hybrid learning practices. The purpose of this study is to assess the hybrid learning process at two Indonesian universities. The context input process product (CIPP) evaluation model is used in this study as part of a mixed method. Quantitative methods are used to get an overview of student and lecturer responses, whereas qualitative methods are used to dig deeper into data about hybrid learning practices. This study included 341 students and 22 lecturers from both universities. Techniques for collecting data include questionnaires, interviews, observation, and documentation studies. The data was analyzed using learning theories. The study’s findings indicate that hybrid learning practices are performing well. The readiness of university infrastructure, as well as the readiness of students and lecturers, determines the success of hybrid learning implementation. In practice, however, some lecturers tend to use face-to-face or online learning practices exclusively to fill gaps in the hybrid learning process. This study suggests that universities investigate an effective model for implementing hybrid learning.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2024-02-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/26588</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26588</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE); Vol 13, No 1: February 2024; 475-487</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-5440</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8822</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijere.v13i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/26588/13790</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>