Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Scientific argumentations research for last 10 years: analysis bibliometric

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024) · hlm. 2127–2139

DOI
10.11591/ijere.v13i4.26374
ISSN
2620-5440, 2252-8822
Terbit
2024-08-01
Penerbit
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

The topic of scientific arguments is crucial to discuss because it is one of the basic sciences that has close links with other topics. Moreover, this science has a close relationship with the skills of the 21st century today. This study aims to reveal the current trends in the scientific argumentation field for the last 10 years based on the Scopus database. This study uses quantitative research through bibliometric studies with the keyword scientific argumentation year. The results of this study indicate that the number of article publications during the years 2012 to 2021 on the topic of scientific argumentation has increased on average. However, the most visible increase was in 2018-2021. The United States, Indonesia, and Germany dominated the publication of scientific argumentation topics from 2012 to 2021. As for the top authors were from the United States and Germany. Furthermore, in scientific argumentation, dominated by subject areas based on science, keywords used are argumentation, students, and scientific argumentation. There were several suggestions for the research, namely: i) the need for further research, especially on the differences and similarities of each argumentation; ii) the need to discuss the appropriate scope of argumentation at the appropriate learning level; iii) collaboration between universities that have a focus on this argumentation field. It is highly recommended that the research be more robust; and iv) future research must adapt to the current development of arguments so that the topic does not decline but continues to become the basis for studying other sciences.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

27 penulis · 79 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 10 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Darul Ulum Islamic University
  • Universitas Madura
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi
  • Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Utama Alan DetaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Nadi SupraptoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Titin SunartiUniversitas Negeri Surabaya2
Khoirun Nisa’Afiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ida KaniawatiIndonesia University of Education1
Budi JatmikoUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Heny Ekawati HaryonoDarul Ulum Islamic University1
Moh ZayyadiUniversitas Madura1
Muhammed Akif KurtuluşAlanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi1
Muhammad SatriawanUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Iqbal Ainur RizkiUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
HUSNI MUBAROKAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Desi WulandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hasan Nuurul HidayaatullaahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alif Syaiful AdamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Putri Dian Nata SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bilqisth Dwi AthiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Khoirun NisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mochammad AhiedUniversitas Trunodjoyo Madura1
Mochammad YasirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Erlina WardaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Üyesi Muhammed Akif KurtulusAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Vivin Khoiri YantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Shabrina SafitriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Scientific argumentations research for last 10 years: analysis bibliometric</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Suliyanah, Suliyanah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Amiruddin, Mohd Zaidi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Prahani, Binar Kurnia</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Bibliometric; Education; Research trends; Science; Scientific argumentation</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The topic of scientific arguments is crucial to discuss because it is one of the basic sciences that has close links with other topics. Moreover, this science has a close relationship with the skills of the 21st century today. This study aims to reveal the current trends in the scientific argumentation field for the last 10 years based on the Scopus database. This study uses quantitative research through bibliometric studies with the keyword scientific argumentation year. The results of this study indicate that the number of article publications during the years 2012 to 2021 on the topic of scientific argumentation has increased on average. However, the most visible increase was in 2018-2021. The United States, Indonesia, and Germany dominated the publication of scientific argumentation topics from 2012 to 2021. As for the top authors were from the United States and Germany. Furthermore, in scientific argumentation, dominated by subject areas based on science, keywords used are argumentation, students, and scientific argumentation. There were several suggestions for the research, namely: i) the need for further research, especially on the differences and similarities of each argumentation; ii) the need to discuss the appropriate scope of argumentation at the appropriate learning level; iii) collaboration between universities that have a focus on this argumentation field. It is highly recommended that the research be more robust; and iv) future research must adapt to the current development of arguments so that the topic does not decline but continues to become the basis for studying other sciences.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US">This work has been funded by Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia under the program DRTPM.</dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2024-08-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/26374</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijere.v13i4.26374</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE); Vol 13, No 4: August 2024; 2127-2139</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-5440</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8822</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijere.v13i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/26374/13966</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>