Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Instrument evaluation of conspiracy theory about COVID-19: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 491–498

DOI
10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22339
ISSN
2620-5440, 2252-8822
Terbit
2022-06-01
Penerbit
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

Students’ beliefs toward conspiracy theory (CT) of COVID-19 can be the indication of science education quality. However, a validated instrument to measure the level of students’ acceptance on the CT about COVID-19 still remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the questionnaire of CT about COVID-19. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items and delivered online to the 400 students of Biology education in Indonesia. The data was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). All items have standard deviation between 1.60 and 2.63, but one item was revealed to have insignificant correlation. The EFA result indicated that the other 13 items had loading factor 0.5 and were categorized into three dimensions. The third dimension was eliminated after the administration of CFA due to only one item in the dimension (λ>0.5). There were three items in the first dimension and two items in the second dimension resulted in λ<0.5. The correlated model from CFA disclosed good values of goodness of fit (GOF), χ2/df=2.527, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) standardized root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.014, comparative fit index (CFI)=0.964, goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.969, adjusted goodness of fit (AGFI)=0.940, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.947, and normed fit index (NFI)=0.943. Therefore, the questionnaire is strongly recommended to measure the level of students’ beliefs toward the CT of COVID-19.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

20 penulis · 51 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 12 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Malang
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Walisongo State Islamic University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Syarif RizaliaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari2
Maryce Agusthinus WalukouUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Jumiati JumiatiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Buton1
Susilawati SusilawatiUniversitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau1
Parlin ParlinInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Tsania Nur DiyanaState University of Malang1
Nurul MurtadhoState University of Malang1
Yusuf HanafiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Alifudin IkhsanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abd Rauf HassanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti ZubaidahState University of Malang1
Susriyati MahanalState University of Malang1
Hendra SusantoNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University1
Arbin Janu SetiyowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adisti RatnapuriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Instrument evaluation of conspiracy theory about COVID-19: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Fauzi, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Saefi, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Adi, Widi Cahya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kristiana, Evi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Lestariani, Nurlita</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Conspiracy theory; COVID-19 pandemic; Misinformation; Science education; Science literacy</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Students’ beliefs toward conspiracy theory (CT) of COVID-19 can be the indication of science education quality. However, a validated instrument to measure the level of students’ acceptance on the CT about COVID-19 still remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the questionnaire of CT about COVID-19. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items and delivered online to the 400 students of Biology education in Indonesia. The data was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). All items have standard deviation between 1.60 and 2.63, but one item was revealed to have insignificant correlation. The EFA result indicated that the other 13 items had loading factor 0.5 and were categorized into three dimensions. The third dimension was eliminated after the administration of CFA due to only one item in the dimension (λ&amp;gt;0.5). There were three items in the first dimension and two items in the second dimension resulted in λ&amp;lt;0.5. The correlated model from CFA disclosed good values of goodness of fit (GOF), χ2/df=2.527, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) standardized root mean square residual (SRMR)=0.014, comparative fit index (CFI)=0.964, goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.969, adjusted goodness of fit (AGFI)=0.940, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.947, and normed fit index (NFI)=0.943. Therefore, the questionnaire is strongly recommended to measure the level of students’ beliefs toward the CT of COVID-19. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2022-06-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/22339</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22339</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE); Vol 11, No 2: June 2022; 491-498</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-5440</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8822</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijere.v11i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/22339/13303</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>