Jurnal
SINTA 2
Sparse Coding-Based Method Comparison For Land-Use Classification
Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (JIKI) · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2017) · pp. 102–107
ISSN 2502-9274, 2088-7051
Published 2017-06-30
Publisher Faculty of Computer Science - Universitas Indonesia
Language eng
Abstract
Land-use classification utilize high-resolution remote sensing image. The image is utilized for improving the classification problem. Nonetheless, in other side, the problem becomes more challenging cause the image is too complex. We have to represent the image appropriately. On of the common method to deal with it is Bag of Visual Word (BOVW). The method needs a coding process to get the final data interpretation. There are many methods to do coding such as Hard Quantization Coding (HQ), Sparse Coding (SC), and Locality-constrained Linear Coding (LCC). However, that coding methods use a different assumption. Therefore, we have to compare the result of each coding method. The coding method affects classification accuracy. The best coding method will produce the better classification result. Dataset UC Merced consisted 21 classes is used in this research. The experiment result shows that LCC got better performance / accuracy than SC and HQ. LCC method got 86.48 % accuracy. Furthermore, LCC also got the best performance on various number of training data for each class.
Collaboration network of the authors
20 authors ·
49 co-authorship links
· 20 across different organisations
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
University of Indonesia The University of Melbourne Pelita Harapan University University of Edinburgh Monash University Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/oai,
first harvested 26 Okt 2026,
last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Sparse Coding-Based Method Comparison For Land-Use Classification</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Sri Arsa, Dewa Made</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jati, Grafika</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Hilman, M H</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Land-use classification</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">high-resolution remote sensing image</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Bag of Visual Word (BOVW)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Sparse Coding (SC)</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Hard Quantization Coding (HQ)</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Land-use classification utilize high-resolution remote sensing image. The image is utilized for improving the classification problem. Nonetheless, in other side, the problem becomes more challenging cause the image is too complex. We have to represent the image appropriately. On of the common method to deal with it is Bag of Visual Word (BOVW). The method needs a coding process to get the final data interpretation. There are many methods to do coding such as Hard Quantization Coding (HQ), Sparse Coding (SC), and Locality-constrained Linear Coding (LCC). However, that coding methods use a different assumption. Therefore, we have to compare the result of each coding method. The coding method affects classification accuracy. The best coding method will produce the better classification result. Dataset UC Merced consisted 21 classes is used in this research. The experiment result shows that LCC got better performance / accuracy than SC and HQ. LCC method got 86.48 % accuracy. Furthermore, LCC also got the best performance on various number of training data for each class.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Computer Science - Universitas Indonesia</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2017-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/article/view/480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.21609/jiki.v10i2.480</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (Journal of Computer Science and Information); 102-107</dc:source>
<dc:source>2502-9274</dc:source>
<dc:source>2088-7051</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.21609/jiki.v10i2</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/article/view/480/377</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Indexed
via DOI
6 citations
Crossref
Indexed
via DOI
6 citations
Counts as reported by each index on 26 Okt 2026; indexes count citations differently.
OpenAlex also lists this work in: crossref, doaj.
Cite this article
APA 7
Sri Arsa, D. M., Jati, G., & Hilman, M. H. (2017). Sparse Coding-Based Method Comparison For Land-Use Classification. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (JIKI), 10(2), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.21609/jiki.v10i2.480
Copy
IEEE
D. M. Sri Arsa, G. Jati, and M. H. Hilman, “Sparse Coding-Based Method Comparison For Land-Use Classification,” Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (JIKI), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 102–107, 2017, doi: 10.21609/jiki.v10i2.480.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.