Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Indonesian High School Students’ Perception of Scientific Experiment Using Network Analysis: Differences between Science and Humanities Group

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 8 No. 3 (2019) · pp. 298–307

DOI
10.15294/jpii.v8i3.18943
ISSN
2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published
2019-09-30
Publisher
Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language
eng

Abstract

Understanding what students know about the scientific experiment is essential for their metacognition and their understanding of scientific inquiry. A total of 425 Indonesian high school students participated in this study. Using an open-ended question, this study examined science and humanities group students’ perception of a scientific experiment by their narrative explanations. Language network analysis method was used to measure and visualize their perception by examining the relationship between each word of response and its patterns underlying the network. After the process of network analysis, nodes “prove”, “observation”, “problem” “hypothesis” only found in science students group while nodes “new” “object” “try” “test” found in humanities students group. This result also perceived that science students group considered a scientific experiment as an inquiry process while humanities students were more likely into the discovery process. The result of this study could support how scientific experiment as a learning activity was taken differently in science and humanities class in high school.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

6 authors · 15 co-authorship links · 9 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Kangwon National University
  • Jeonbuk National University
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Indonesian High School Students’ Perception of Scientific Experiment Using Network Analysis: Differences between Science and Humanities Group</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Aini, R. Q.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sya’bandari, Y.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rusmana, A. N.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Lee, J. K.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Shin, S.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ha, M.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">experiment, Semantic Network Analysis (SNA), scientific, students’ perception</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Understanding what students know about the scientific experiment is essential for their metacognition and their understanding of scientific inquiry. A total of 425 Indonesian high school students participated in this study. Using an open-ended question, this study examined science and humanities group students’ perception of a scientific experiment by their narrative explanations. Language network analysis method was used to measure and visualize their perception by examining the relationship between each word of response and its patterns underlying the network. After the process of network analysis, nodes “prove”, “observation”, “problem” “hypothesis” only found in science students group while nodes “new” “object” “try” “test” found in humanities students group. This result also perceived that science students group considered a scientific experiment as an inquiry process while humanities students were more likely into the discovery process. The result of this study could support how scientific experiment as a learning activity was taken differently in science and humanities class in high school.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2019-09-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/18943</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v8i3.18943</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 8, No 3 (2019): September 2019; 298-307</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v8i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/18943/9590</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/18943/4493</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/18943/4494</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/18943/4495</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>