Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Learning Experience of Pre-Service Physics Teachers in Developing Simple Project Loaded by Life Skills

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 122–129

DOI
10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10889
ISSN
2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published
2018-04-03
Publisher
Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

This research aims to reveal the experience profile of future Physics teachers in developing simple multi-loaded life skill project. The research method used was a descriptive method with 62 future Physics teachers as the research subject. Based on observations, interviews, and questionnaires, it was drawn descriptions of the future teachers’ experiences in developing a simple project. The future teachers were assessed based on some Physics indicators such as project design, project creation, data collection, data analysis, and creativity. The results of the project preparation descriptions obtained by the experience data of future Physics teachers indicate the highest score of 4.8 (96%) on the indicator of schedule making, while the lowest score was 2.9 (58%) on the indicators of formulating the product benefits, preparing the feasibility analysis and analyzing the environmental impact. The results show that future Physics teachers got the highest score of 4.6 (93%) on data adjustment for experimental purposes indicator, and the lowest score of 2.8 (55%) on designing tools and materials indicator. Based on the Physics props trial, it was obtained the highest score of 4.5 (89%) on the indicator of analyzing the baseline data, while the lowest score of 2.9 (58%) was on the variation test variables. Positive feedback about time-management in completing the project, the ability to identify the topic of the project, the ability to find ideas to support the completion of the project, the ability to test the tools, and the ability to make progress reports on project completion were derived from the interviews. The highest score of students’ responses to project completion was 4.8 (95%) on the second data collection indicator and the lowest was 3.2 (64%) on the instrument material design indicator.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

21 authors · 47 co-authorship links · 30 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • State University of Semarang
  • Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
  • UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • National University of Laos
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Joko SiswantoAffiliation unknown1
Hanandita Veda SaphiraAffiliation unknown1
Sigit RistantoUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
Affandi Faisal KurniawanUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
Moh. Agung RokhimawanSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
F. YuliawatiSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
I. KamalaSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
Evi Fatimatur RusydiyahUIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1
Desy IndarwatiUIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1
Syaiful JazilUIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya1
G. GusniwatiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare1
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang1
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang1
Choirul HudaUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
S. SulhadiState University of Semarang1
Azizul Ghofar Candra WicaksonoUniversity of Szeged1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Learning Experience of Pre-Service Physics Teachers in Developing Simple Project Loaded by Life Skills</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Susilawati, S.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Khoiri, N.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wijayanto, W.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Masturi, M.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Xaphakdy, S.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Simple Projects, Multi life skills.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This research aims to reveal the experience profile of future Physics teachers in developing simple multi-loaded life skill project. The research method used was a descriptive method with 62 future Physics teachers as the research subject. Based on observations, interviews, and questionnaires, it was drawn descriptions of the future teachers’ experiences in developing a simple project. The future teachers were assessed based on some Physics indicators such as project design, project creation, data collection, data analysis, and creativity. The results of the project preparation descriptions obtained by the experience data of future Physics teachers indicate the highest score of 4.8 (96%) on the indicator of schedule making, while the lowest score was 2.9 (58%) on the indicators of formulating the product benefits, preparing the feasibility analysis and analyzing the environmental impact. The results show that future Physics teachers got the highest score of 4.6 (93%) on data adjustment for experimental purposes indicator, and the lowest score of 2.8 (55%) on designing tools and materials indicator. Based on the Physics props trial, it was obtained the highest score of 4.5 (89%) on the indicator of analyzing the baseline data, while the lowest score of 2.9 (58%) was on the variation test variables. Positive feedback about time-management in completing the project, the ability to identify the topic of the project, the ability to find ideas to support the completion of the project, the ability to test the tools, and the ability to make progress reports on project completion were derived from the interviews. The highest score of students’ responses to project completion was 4.8 (95%) on the second data collection indicator and the lowest was 3.2 (64%) on the instrument material design indicator.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2018-04-03</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/10889</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10889</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 7, No 1 (2018): March 2018; 122-129</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/10889/7632</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>