Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

THE APPLICATION OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TO IMPROVE “SATU ATAP” STUDENTS’ LEARNING RESULTS AT SMPN 4 SINGOSARI MALANG

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2016) · pp. 45–50

DOI
10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5788
ISSN
2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published
2016-04-18
Publisher
Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

The implementation of the learning device with inquiry learning model into a developed model and tested in the learning process in elementary and junior high school “Satu Atap” 4 Singosari Malang. This type of research is done through experimentation with pre-experimental design that is implemented by the design of one group pretest and posttest design. The trial results with the learning device guided by inquiry learning model at the elementary-SMPN 4 “Satu Atap” Singosari Malang shows that the activities carried out as many as four meetings run according to the lesson plans have been made. Learning by using inquiry model on electric material can be accomplished through: 1. Identification of question / formulate problem with the average score 3:38 (pretty good), step 2. Formulate a hypothesis with an average score of 3:25 (pretty good), step 3. Designing and observation/ experiment with an average score of 3:50 (well), step 4. Collecting and analyzing the data with an average score of 3:38 (pretty good), and step 5. Drawing conclusions/ generalizations with an average score of 3:38 (pretty good). Learning models for additives substance material with step 1. Identify the question / formulate the problem got an average score of 3:13 (pretty good), step 2. Formulate a hypothesis to get an average score 3:13 (pretty good), step 3. Designing and making observations / experiment with an average score of 3:38 (pretty good), step 4. Collecting and analyzing the data with an average score of 3:25 (pretty good), and step 5. Drawing conclusions / generalizations with an average score of 3:50 (well). The students’ learning outcomes using inquiry learning model covers aspects of knowledge, skills and attitudes obtained as follows: the aspect of knowledge through the pretest and posttest on the matter of electricity has increased the average percentage score from 42.6 on the pretest become 67.7 with an average score of N-Gain 0.44 in the medium category, while the knowledge aspect of learning outcomes on additive substance material has increased the average percentage of the score from 42.6 to 82.2 in pretest and posttest with an average score of N-Gain 0.69 in the medium category. The skill aspects on electricity material get the highest score in the predicate B +, while the highest score of additive substance material on the predicate A-, as well as attitudes aspects shows that more than 50% students show a good attitude during the learning process, ie 67% on the electricity material and 80% on the additives substance material.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

16 authors · 33 co-authorship links · 3 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
W. WidodoUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Dhita Ayu Permata SariUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Elok SudibyoUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Suryanti SuryantiUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Inzanah InzanahUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Laily RosdianaUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Martini MartiniUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Hasan SubektiUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Sudarmin SudarminState University of Semarang1
Wahyu Budi SabtiawanUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Dian Kurvayanti InnatesariUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Yuli AstutiAffiliation unknown1
Debora Pebriany Butar ButarAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE APPLICATION OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TO IMPROVE “SATU ATAP” STUDENTS’ LEARNING RESULTS AT SMPN 4 SINGOSARI MALANG</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Setiawan, B.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sunarti, T.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Astriani, D.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Inquiry Learning Model, Science Learning Media, Students’ Learning Outcomes</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The implementation of the learning device with inquiry learning model into a developed model and tested in the learning process in elementary and junior high school “Satu Atap” 4 Singosari Malang. This type of research is done through experimentation with pre-experimental design that is implemented by the design of one group pretest and posttest design. The trial results with the learning device guided by inquiry learning model at the elementary-SMPN 4 “Satu Atap” Singosari Malang shows that the activities carried out as many as four meetings run according to the lesson plans have been made. Learning by using inquiry model on electric material can be accomplished through: 1. Identification of question / formulate problem with the average score 3:38 (pretty good), step 2. Formulate a hypothesis with an average score of 3:25 (pretty good), step 3. Designing and observation/ experiment with an average score of 3:50 (well), step 4. Collecting and analyzing the data with an average score of 3:38 (pretty good), and step 5. Drawing conclusions/ generalizations with an average score of 3:38 (pretty good). Learning models for additives substance material with step 1. Identify the question / formulate the problem got an average score of 3:13 (pretty good), step 2. Formulate a hypothesis to get an average score 3:13 (pretty good), step 3. Designing and making observations / experiment with an average score of 3:38 (pretty good), step 4. Collecting and analyzing the data with an average score of 3:25 (pretty good), and step 5. Drawing conclusions / generalizations with an average score of 3:50 (well). The students’ learning outcomes using inquiry learning model covers aspects of knowledge, skills and attitudes obtained as follows: the aspect of knowledge through the pretest and posttest on the matter of electricity has increased the average percentage score from 42.6 on the pretest become 67.7 with an average score of N-Gain 0.44 in the medium category, while the knowledge aspect of learning outcomes on additive substance material has increased the average percentage of the score from 42.6 to 82.2 in pretest and posttest with an average score of N-Gain 0.69 in the medium category. The skill aspects on electricity material get the highest score in the predicate B +, while the highest score of additive substance material on the predicate A-, as well as attitudes aspects shows that more than 50% students show a good attitude during the learning process, ie 67% on the electricity material and 80% on the additives substance material.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2016-04-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/5788</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5788</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 5, No 1 (2016): April 2016; 45-50</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v5i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/5788/4704</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>