Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Hemodynamic stabilization in cesarean section patients administered spinal anesthesia: a quasi-experimental study comparing ephedrine and phenylephrine

International Journal of Public Health Science · Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 466–473

DOI
10.11591/ijphs.v15i2.26957
ISSN
2620-4126, 2252-8806
Terbit
2026-06-01
Penerbit
Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This quasi-experimental research aimed to compare the effects observed following the administration of ephedrine 10 mg and phenylephrine 50 mg administered as therapeutic bolus doses for the management of intraoperative hypotension due to spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. The study involved 60 parturients who developed intraoperative hypotension during spinal anesthesia, who were divided into two groups treated with either phenylephrine or ephedrine. Maternal blood pressure, including systolic and diastolic values, was assessed pre- and post- vasopressor administration and analyzed using descriptive statistics, normality testing, and independent-samples t-tests. Both vasopressors were associated with increased maternal blood pressure following intervention, with no significant differences observed at baseline. However, between-group comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in post-intervention systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05), indicating distinct hemodynamic response profiles. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of both ephedrine and phenylephrine in treating hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia; vasopressor selection influences maternal blood pressure outcomes. From a practical perspective, this study provides clinically relevant evidence to inform anesthetic decision-making in maternal healthcare services, particularly in settings where therapeutic bolus administration is routinely utilized for the management of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

16 penulis · 53 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 12 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi, Sains, dan Kesehatan RS.DR. Soepraoen Kesdam V/BRW
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya
  • Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Buleleng
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Agus Budi PrasetyoInstitut Teknologi, Sains, dan Kesehatan RS.DR. Soepraoen Kesdam V/BRW8
Ircham SaifudinInstitut Teknologi, Sains, dan Kesehatan RS.DR. Soepraoen Kesdam V/BRW8
Suryanto SuryantoInstitut Teknologi, Sains, dan Kesehatan RS.DR. Soepraoen Kesdam V/BRW5
SuryantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Annes Rindy PermanaInstitut Teknologi, Sains, dan Kesehatan RS.DR. Soepraoen Kesdam V/BRW4
Ahsan AhsanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nur HidaayahUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya1
Lilik SupriatiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Renny NovaUniversity of Brawijaya1
I Dewa Ayu RismayantiSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Buleleng1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijphs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJPHS/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Hemodynamic stabilization in cesarean section patients administered spinal anesthesia: a quasi-experimental study comparing ephedrine and phenylephrine</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sintara, Sindu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Permana, Annes Rindy</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Negoro, Widigdo Rekso</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suryanto, Suryanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Priyonggo, Reko</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rodli, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This quasi-experimental research aimed to compare the effects observed following the administration of ephedrine 10 mg and phenylephrine 50 mg administered as therapeutic bolus doses for the management of intraoperative hypotension due to spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. The study involved 60 parturients who developed intraoperative hypotension during spinal anesthesia, who were divided into two groups treated with either phenylephrine or ephedrine. Maternal blood pressure, including systolic and diastolic values, was assessed pre- and post- vasopressor administration and analyzed using descriptive statistics, normality testing, and independent-samples t-tests. Both vasopressors were associated with increased maternal blood pressure following intervention, with no significant differences observed at baseline. However, between-group comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in post-intervention systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p &amp;lt; 0.05), indicating distinct hemodynamic response profiles. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of both ephedrine and phenylephrine in treating hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia; vasopressor selection influences maternal blood pressure outcomes. From a practical perspective, this study provides clinically relevant evidence to inform anesthetic decision-making in maternal healthcare services, particularly in settings where therapeutic bolus administration is routinely utilized for the management of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2026-06-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijphs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJPHS/article/view/26957</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijphs.v15i2.26957</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS); Vol 15, No 2: June 2026; 466-473</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-4126</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8806</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijphs.v15i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijphs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJPHS/article/view/26957/14776</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Sindu Sintara, Annes Rindy Permana, Widigdo Rekso Negoro, Suryanto, Reko Priyonggo, Muhammad Rodli</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>