Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 1

Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Incidents Classification from Twitter Textual Information

Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022) · pp. 31–41

DOI
10.20473/jisebi.8.1.31-41
ISSN
2443-2555, 2598-6333
Published
2022-04-26
Publisher
Universitas Airlangga
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Background: Twitter is one of the most used social media, with 310 million active users monthly and 500 million tweets per day. Twitter is not only used to talk about trending topics but also to share information about accidents, fires, traffic jams, etc. People often find these updates useful to minimize the impact. Objective: The current study compares the effectiveness of three deep learning methods (CNN, RCNN, CLSTM) combined with neuroNER in classifying multi-label incidents. Methods: NeuroNER is paired with different deep learning classification methods (CNN, RCNN, CLSTM). Results: CNN paired with NeuroNER yield the best results for multi-label classification compared to CLSTM and RCNN. Conclusion: CNN was proven to be more effective with an average precision value of 88.54% for multi-label incidents classification. This is because the data we used for the classification resulted from NER, which was in the form of entity labels. CNN immediately distinguishes important information, namely the NER labels. CLSTM generates the worst result because it is more suitable for sequential data. Future research will benefit from changing the classification parameters and test scenarios on a different number of labels with more diverse data. Keywords: CLSTM, CNN, Incident Classification, Multi-label Classification, RCNN

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 96 co-authorship links · 10 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Hasanuddin University
  • University of Indonesia
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nanik SuciatiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember12
Handayani TjandrasaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember7
Agus Zainal ArifinInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember6
Siti RochimahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember4
Agus Budi RaharjoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember4
Rizka Wakhidatus SholikahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember4
Hilya TsaniyaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember4
Riyanarto SarnoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember4
Anny YuniartiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
Apriantoni ApriantoniInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
Yudhi PurwanantoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
Hari GinardiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Ahmad SaikhuInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Erika MaulidiyaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Abid Famasya AbdillahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Safitri JuanitaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Hendra MesraHasanuddin University2
Kelly Rossa SungkonoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Eha Renwi AstutiUniversitas Airlangga2
Ramadhan Hardani PutraUniversitas Airlangga2
Rachmad AbdullahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Salsabila SalsabilaInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Bilqis AmaliahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
M. Rahmat WidyantoUniversity of Indonesia1
Khoirul UmamInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Fidi Wincoko PutroInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Gulpi Qorik Oktagalu PratamasunuAffiliation unknown1
Khadijah Fahmi Hayati HolleInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Jayanti Yusmah SariUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Arif FadllullahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Dasrit Debora KamudiInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Muhamad NasirInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Mutmainnah MuchtarInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Dhian KartikaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JISEBI/oai, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Incidents Classification from Twitter Textual Information</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Anggraeni, Sherly Rosa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ranggianto, Narandha Arya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ghozali, Imam</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fatichah, Chastine</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Purwitasari, Diana</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Background: Twitter is one of the most used social media, with 310 million active users monthly and 500 million tweets per day. Twitter is not only used to talk about trending topics but also to share information about accidents, fires, traffic jams, etc. People often find these updates useful to minimize the impact.
Objective: The current study compares the effectiveness of three deep learning methods (CNN, RCNN, CLSTM) combined with neuroNER in classifying multi-label incidents.
Methods: NeuroNER is paired with different deep learning classification methods (CNN, RCNN, CLSTM).
Results: CNN paired with NeuroNER yield the best results for multi-label classification compared to CLSTM and RCNN.
Conclusion: CNN was proven to be more effective with an average precision value of 88.54% for multi-label incidents classification. This is because the data we used for the classification resulted from NER, which was in the form of entity labels. CNN immediately distinguishes important information, namely the NER labels. CLSTM generates the worst result because it is more suitable for sequential data. Future research will benefit from changing the classification parameters and test scenarios on a different number of labels with more diverse data.
Keywords: CLSTM, CNN, Incident Classification, Multi-label Classification, RCNN</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-04-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JISEBI/article/view/32244</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/jisebi.8.1.31-41</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): April; 31-41</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2443-2555</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-6333</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JISEBI/article/view/32244/17559</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Universitas Airlangga.</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>