Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

Deep Image Deblurring for Non-Uniform Blur: a Comparative Study of Restormer and BANet

Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (JIKI) · Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024) · pp. 175–183

DOI
10.21609/jiki.v17i2.1274
ISSN
2502-9274, 2088-7051
Published
2024-06-03
Publisher
Faculty of Computer Science - Universitas Indonesia
Language
eng

Abstract

Image blur is one of the common degradations on an image. The blur that occurs on the captured images is sometimes non-uniform, with different levels of blur in different areas of the image. In recent years, most deblurring methods have been deep learning-based. These methods model deblurring as an imageto-image translation problem, treating images globally. This may result in poor performance when handling non-uniform blur in images. Therefore, in this paper, the author compared two state-of-the-art supervised deep learning methods for deblurring and restoration, e.g. BANet and Restormer, with a special focus on the non-uniform blur. The GOPRO training dataset, which is also used in various studies as a benchmark, was used to train the models. The trained models were then tested on the GOPRO testing test, the HIDE testing set for cross-dataset testing, and GOPRO-NU, which consists of specifically selected non-uniform blurred images from the GOPRO testing set, for the non-uniform deblur testing. On the GOPRO testing set, Restormer achieved an SSIM of 0.891 and PSNR of 27.66 while BANet obtained an SSIM of 0.926 and PSNR of 34.90. Meanwhile, for the HIDE dataset, Restormer achieved an SSIM of 0.907 and PSNR of 27.93 while BANet obtained an SSIM of 0.908 and PSNR of 34.52. Finally, on the non-uniform blur GOPRO dataset, Restormer achieved an SSIM of 0.911 and PSNR of 29.48 while BANet obtained an SSIM of 0.935 and PSNR of 35.47. Overall, BANet shows the best result in handling non-uniform blur with a significant improvement over Restormer.

Collaboration network of the authors

7 authors · 9 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Indonesia
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ikhlasul Akmal HanifUniversity of Indonesia1
Eduardus TjitrahardjaUniversity of Indonesia1
Rahmat Bryan NaufalUniversity of Indonesia1
Steven Christ Pinantyo ArwidarastoUniversity of Indonesia1
Alexander CalvinUniversity of Indonesia1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/oai, first harvested 26 Okt 2026, last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Deep Image Deblurring for Non-Uniform Blur: a Comparative Study of Restormer and BANet</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nugraha, Made Prastha</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rahadianti, Laksmita</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Image blur is one of the common degradations on an image. The blur that occurs on the captured images is sometimes non-uniform, with different levels of blur in different areas of the image. In recent years, most deblurring methods have been deep learning-based. These methods model deblurring as an imageto-image translation problem, treating images globally. This may result in poor performance when handling non-uniform blur in images. Therefore, in this paper, the author compared two state-of-the-art supervised deep learning methods for deblurring and restoration, e.g. BANet and Restormer, with a special focus on the non-uniform blur. The GOPRO training dataset, which is also used in various studies as a benchmark, was used to train the models. The trained models were then tested on the GOPRO testing test, the HIDE testing set for cross-dataset testing, and GOPRO-NU, which consists of specifically selected non-uniform blurred images from the GOPRO testing set, for the non-uniform deblur testing. On the GOPRO testing set, Restormer achieved an SSIM of 0.891 and PSNR of 27.66 while BANet obtained an SSIM of 0.926 and PSNR of 34.90. Meanwhile, for the HIDE dataset, Restormer achieved an SSIM of 0.907 and PSNR of 27.93 while BANet obtained an SSIM of 0.908 and PSNR of 34.52. Finally, on the non-uniform blur GOPRO dataset, Restormer achieved an SSIM of 0.911 and PSNR of 29.48 while BANet obtained an SSIM of 0.935 and PSNR of 35.47. Overall, BANet shows the best result in handling non-uniform blur with a significant improvement over Restormer.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Computer Science  - Universitas Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-06-03</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/article/view/1274</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21609/jiki.v17i2.1274</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (Journal of Computer Science and Information); 175-183</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-9274</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-7051</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.21609/jiki.v17i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/article/view/1274/515</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>