Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Legal Validity of Electronic Summons in Indonesia’s Civil Procedural Law: A Study of Supreme Court Regulation No. 7 of 2022

JURNAL HUKUM · Vol. 41 No. 4 (2025) · hlm. 1055–1077

DOI
10.26532/jh.v41i4.45276
ISSN
2723-6668, 1412-2723
Terbit
2025-12-17
Penerbit
Unissula
Bahasa
en

Abstrak

Digital transformation in Indonesia’s judicial administration is reflected in the implementation of the electronic justice system, particularly through the regulation of e-summons. However, in practice, the e-summons mechanism intersects with the principles of legality and propriety of relaas (summons) as regulated under civil procedural law. This article examines the legal validity of electronic summons as regulated by Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022 within the framework of civil procedural law that remains guided by the HIR and RBg. It also analyzes legal issues arising from the delivery of summons through external parties, which raises concerns regarding authority, accountability, and procedural legitimacy. This study employs a normative legal research method, using statutory analysis, a conceptual approach to procedural law principles, and a comparative approach to electronic summons practices in several other countries. The findings reveal normative inconsistencies between conventional procedural law and recent digital regulations, as well as unresolved legal issues related to the involvement of third parties in delivering summons. These challenges highlight the need for a reformulation of civil procedural law that accommodates technological developments without undermining legal certainty and procedural justice.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

36 penulis · 80 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • University of Brawijaya
  • University of Mataram
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Kukuh TejomurtiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rika KurniatyAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
SukarmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Elisabeth Septin PuspoayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Setyo WidagdoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Amelia Sri Kusuma DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Theta MurtyAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
SITI HAMIDAHAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afrizal Mukti WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dhiana PuspitawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lukman Yudho PrakosoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nuddin HarahabAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ranitya GanindhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Azahlia UmarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurjannah NurjannahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Moh. FadliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Rifqinizamy KarsayudaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yudhi Tri PermonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wayan Firdaus MahmudyUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mohamad Rivaldi MohaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afifah KusumadaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prija DjatmikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Nugrahayu DeviantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
AHNIA SEPTYA KARINAAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endang Sri KawuryanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Budi SantosoUniversity of Mataram1
Hanif Nur WidhiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah Dwi QurbaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syaifudin ZuchriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pan Moh. FaizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fransiska A. SusantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hassan QaqayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukum/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Legal Validity of Electronic Summons in Indonesia’s Civil Procedural Law: A Study of Supreme Court Regulation No. 7 of 2022</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mardyansyah, Dody Novizar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sukarmi, Sukarmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Kusumaningrum, Adi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Widyanti, Yenny Eta</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">E-Summons</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Civil Procedural Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">E-Court System</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal Validity</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Perma No. 7/2022</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Digital transformation in Indonesia’s judicial administration is reflected in the implementation of the electronic justice system, particularly through the regulation of e-summons. However, in practice, the e-summons mechanism intersects with the principles of legality and propriety of relaas (summons) as regulated under civil procedural law. This article examines the legal validity of electronic summons as regulated by Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022 within the framework of civil procedural law that remains guided by the HIR and RBg. It also analyzes legal issues arising from the delivery of summons through external parties, which raises concerns regarding authority, accountability, and procedural legitimacy. This study employs a normative legal research method, using statutory analysis, a conceptual approach to procedural law principles, and a comparative approach to electronic summons practices in several other countries. The findings reveal normative inconsistencies between conventional procedural law and recent digital regulations, as well as unresolved legal issues related to the involvement of third parties in delivering summons. These challenges highlight the need for a reformulation of civil procedural law that accommodates technological developments without undermining legal certainty and procedural justice.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Unissula</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukum/article/view/45276</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.26532/jh.v41i4.45276</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Hukum; Vol. 41 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Hukum; 1055-1077</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Jurnal Hukum; Vol 41 No 4 (2025): Jurnal Hukum; 1055-1077</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2723-6668</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1412-2723</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.26532/jh.v41i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukum/article/view/45276/14515</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Dody Novizar Mardyansyah, Sukarmi, Adi Kusumaningrum, Yenny Eta Widyanti</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>