Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Reforming Ethical Policing in Indonesia: Legal Protection for Conscientious Objection and the Duty to Disobey Unlawful Orders

Jambe Law Journal · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 839–869

DOI
10.22437/5w3e5821
ISSN
2598-795X, 2598-7925
Terbit
2025-12-31
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Jambi University
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

In the context of police institutions in Indonesia, members of the police force are often faced with a dilemma when receiving orders from superiors that have the potential to violate the law. On the one hand, there is an obligation to uphold the law and protect human rights. The conflict raises legal questions about the extent to which police officers in Indonesia are protected when they refuse or disobey unlawful orders, based on the principles of the right to conscientious objection and the duty to disobey. This study uses normative legal research and comparative doctrinal analysis to examine the conceptual underpinnings of these principles and evaluate institutional practice. Through an analysis of international legal instruments, national regulations, relevant case studies, and selected comparative materials, this article concludes that these two principles are an integral part of the development of a democratic, accountable, and human rights-oriented police institution in Indonesia, and therefore deserve comprehensive legal protection.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 99 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Milda IstiqomahAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rika KurniatyAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Wahbi RahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dhiana PuspitawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Elisabeth Septin PuspoayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Adi KusumaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sudarsono SudarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ramalinggam RajamanickamAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dedik BudiantaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wiwik HardaningsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
As'ad SyaziliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
AisyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sherin Angeli HarlimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rusdi EvizalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sudi PramonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nandu DyanataAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul Rachmad BudionoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tunggul AnshariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M Nur SyafiuddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rachmad Safa’atAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Istislam IstislamAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Edi WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Robert Lengkong WekuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Noor Dzuhaidah OsmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ariesta Wibisono AndityaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Natalia MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Priesty Yustika PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Satria Unggul Wicaksana PrakasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ikaningtyas IkaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fransiska A. SusantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Choirul HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Herman SuryokumoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Patricia Audrey RuslijantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur ChanifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fines FatimahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jlj.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Reforming Ethical Policing in Indonesia: Legal Protection for Conscientious Objection and the Duty to Disobey Unlawful Orders</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Riphat, Mohammad Fattah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Widagdo, Setyo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Djatmika, Prija</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Madjid, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Risyawan, Alief</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Right to Conscientious Objection</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Duty to Disobey</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Unlawful Orders</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Police Ethics</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Legal Protection</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">In the context of police institutions in Indonesia, members of the police force are often faced with a dilemma when receiving orders from superiors that have the potential to violate the law. On the one hand, there is an obligation to uphold the law and protect human rights. The conflict raises legal questions about the extent to which police officers in Indonesia are protected when they refuse or disobey unlawful orders, based on the principles of the right to conscientious objection and the duty to disobey. This study uses normative legal research and comparative doctrinal analysis to examine the conceptual underpinnings of these principles and evaluate institutional practice. Through an analysis of international legal instruments, national regulations, relevant case studies, and selected comparative materials, this article concludes that these two principles are an integral part of the development of a democratic, accountable, and human rights-oriented police institution in Indonesia, and therefore deserve comprehensive legal protection.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Jambi University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jlj.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/622</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/5w3e5821</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jambe Law Journal; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025); 839-869</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-795X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-7925</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jlj.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/622/118</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Jambe Law Journal</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>