Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Legalization or Enforcement? Fiscal Justice and MSME Protection in Indonesia’s Thrifting Policy

Jambe Law Journal · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 395–434

DOI
10.22437/nw2xcw05
ISSN
2598-795X, 2598-7925
Terbit
2026-07-23
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Jambi University
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This article addresses the policy dilemma surrounding Indonesia’s prohibition on imported used clothing, which pits trade law enforcement and domestic textile protection against the socio-economic survival of thrifting merchants operating as MSMEs. It investigates whether taxing these activities can be justified when the underlying traded goods remain legally banned. While previous legal scholarship has treated trade restrictions, tax law, and MSME protection in a fragmented manner, this study establishes a novel, integrated research position by examining these intersecting regimes through a unified normative legal framework. Using a normative juridical method, the paper evaluates relevant laws, regulations, and tax court decisions through statutory, conceptual, and public policy approaches. The discussion demonstrates that direct taxation of prohibited imported goods creates severe normative ambiguity and fails to satisfy substantive fiscal justice. However, the study concludes that a "non-legitimate transitional scheme" is legally viable. This alternative policy separates the legal status of the goods from the business subjects, limiting taxation strictly to lawful domestic economic aspects while actively providing business conversion and structured MSME empowerment support.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 105 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • State University of Gorontalo
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ridwan ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Indah Sri UtariAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Valerio SebastianAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mohamed Cheikh BananeAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ngboawaji Daniel NteAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Shofriya Qonitatin AbidahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mutmainah Nur QoiriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Varun ChhachharAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zaenuri ZaenuriState University of Semarang1
Fathur RokhmanState University of Semarang1
Heri YantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gunawan TjokroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul RajagukgukAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Satrio Sakti NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Harry NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tajudeen SanniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Irawaty IrawatyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Said AmrullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Miftahuddin AhmadAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Iqbal BaiquniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti AlviahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul Hamid TomeState University of Gorontalo1
Erman I. RahimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohamad Afriyansyah DukalangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nuvazria AchirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali RoziqinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sholahuddin Al-FatihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Dahlan AsyariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muwaffiq JufriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Paul Atagamen AidonojieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Erma RusdianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lindra DarnelaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daud RismanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fenny BintarawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rayno Dwi AdityoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jlj.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Legalization or Enforcement? Fiscal Justice and MSME Protection in Indonesia’s Thrifting Policy</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ibnususilo, Efendi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Shalihah, Fithriatus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hariz, Hajar Salamah Salsabila</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Barak, Ahmed Mohamed</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ezzerouali, Souad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">thrifting</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">fiscal justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">MSMEs</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">taxation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">import prohibition</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This article addresses the policy dilemma surrounding Indonesia’s prohibition on imported used clothing, which pits trade law enforcement and domestic textile protection against the socio-economic survival of thrifting merchants operating as MSMEs. It investigates whether taxing these activities can be justified when the underlying traded goods remain legally banned. While previous legal scholarship has treated trade restrictions, tax law, and MSME protection in a fragmented manner, this study establishes a novel, integrated research position by examining these intersecting regimes through a unified normative legal framework. Using a normative juridical method, the paper evaluates relevant laws, regulations, and tax court decisions through statutory, conceptual, and public policy approaches. The discussion demonstrates that direct taxation of prohibited imported goods creates severe normative ambiguity and fails to satisfy substantive fiscal justice. However, the study concludes that a "non-legitimate transitional scheme" is legally viable. This alternative policy separates the legal status of the goods from the business subjects, limiting taxation strictly to lawful domestic economic aspects while actively providing business conversion and structured MSME empowerment support.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Jambi University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-07-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jlj.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/656</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/nw2xcw05</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jambe Law Journal; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): 2026; 395-434</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-795X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2598-7925</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22437/zj6px532</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jlj.unja.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/656/135</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Efendi Ibnususilo, Fithriatus Shalihah, Hajar Salamah Salsabila Hariz, Ahmed Mohamed Barak, Souad Ezzerouali</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>