Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

Comparing ASM and Learning-Based Methods for Satellite Image Dehazing

Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (JIKI) · Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025) · pp. 229–238

DOI
10.21609/jiki.v18i2.1521
ISSN
2502-9274, 2088-7051
Published
2025-06-26
Publisher
Faculty of Computer Science - Universitas Indonesia
Language
eng

Abstract

Recent advancements in optical satellite technologies have significantly improved image resolution, providing more detailed information about Earth's surface. However, atmospheric interference, such as haze, is still a major factor in image capture. The interference results in visibility degradation of the acquired images, hindering computer vision tasks. Numerous studies have proposed various methods to recover haze-affected regions in satellite images, highlighting the need for more effective solutions. Motivated by this, this paper compares different atmospheric dehazing methods, including Atmospheric Scattering Model (ASM)-based and deep learning-based. The results show that SRD is the best ASM-based method, with a PSNR value of 19.09 dB and an SSIM of 0.908. Among deep learning models, DW-GAN achieves the best restoration results with a PSNR value of 26.22 dB and an SSIM of 0.959. SRD offers faster inference times, but still suffers from residual haze and noticeable color degradation compared to DW-GAN. In contrast, DW-GAN provides a more complete haze removal at the cost of higher computational demands than ASM-based methods.

Collaboration network of the authors

7 authors · 9 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Indonesia
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Made Prastha NugrahaUniversity of Indonesia1
Ikhlasul Akmal HanifUniversity of Indonesia1
Eduardus TjitrahardjaUniversity of Indonesia1
Rahmat Bryan NaufalUniversity of Indonesia1
Alexander CalvinUniversity of Indonesia1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/oai, first harvested 26 Okt 2026, last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Comparing ASM and Learning-Based Methods for Satellite Image Dehazing</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Steven Christ Pinantyo Arwidarasto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rahadianti, Laksmita</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Recent advancements in optical satellite technologies have significantly improved image resolution, providing more detailed information about Earth's surface. However, atmospheric interference, such as haze, is still a major factor in image capture. The interference results in visibility degradation of the acquired images, hindering computer vision tasks. Numerous studies have proposed various methods to recover haze-affected regions in satellite images, highlighting the need for more effective solutions. Motivated by this, this paper compares different atmospheric dehazing methods, including Atmospheric Scattering Model (ASM)-based and deep learning-based. The results show that SRD is the best ASM-based method, with a PSNR value of 19.09 dB and an SSIM of 0.908. Among deep learning models, DW-GAN achieves the best restoration results with a PSNR value of 26.22 dB and an SSIM of 0.959. SRD offers faster inference times, but still suffers from residual haze and noticeable color degradation compared to DW-GAN. In contrast, DW-GAN provides a more complete haze removal at the cost of higher computational demands than ASM-based methods.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Computer Science  - Universitas Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-06-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/article/view/1521</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21609/jiki.v18i2.1521</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi (Journal of Computer Science and Information); 229-238</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-9274</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-7051</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.21609/jiki.v18i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jiki.cs.ui.ac.id/index.php/jiki/article/view/1521/545</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informasi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>