Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Beyond Litigation: Enhancing Patient Rights and Medical Dispute Settlement in Indonesia through Australian and Singaporean Models

Jambura Law Review · Vol. UME No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 621–644

DOI
10.33756/jlr.v1i2.36031
ISSN
2656-0461, 2654-9255
Terbit
2026-07-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Medical dispute resolution in Indonesia remains a significant challenge, particularly regarding the effectiveness of legal mechanisms for both patients and medical professionals. In practice, medical disputes in Indonesia often involve lengthy and complex litigation, as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has not been fully optimized. This study compares Indonesia’s system with those of Australia and Singapore to identify strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements for Indonesia's legal framework. It employs a normative juridical method and comparative legal analysis, drawing data from legislation and legal literature on medical dispute resolution. The study examines regulations, dispute resolution mechanisms, and legal protections for patients and medical professionals in the three countries. The findings indicate that Australia and Singapore rely more on mediation and reconciliation, which provide faster and more effective resolutions. Meanwhile, Indonesia still depends on litigation, which is often slow and inefficient. To improve medical dispute resolution in Indonesia, strengthening ADR mechanisms by adopting best practices from Australia and Singapore is essential. This would help establish a fairer, more efficient system that better protects both patients and medical professionals.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

10 penulis · 16 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Pattimura
  • Universitas Mahendradatta
  • United Arab Emirates University
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yosia HetharieUniversitas Pattimura3
Agustina BalikUniversitas Pattimura1
Triska DemmataccoUniversitas Pattimura1
Ronald SaijaUniversitas Pattimura1
Putri AnggiaUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona1
Elsa Rina Maya TouleAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jacob HatuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Beyond Litigation: Enhancing Patient Rights and Medical Dispute Settlement in Indonesia through Australian and Singaporean Models</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sihotang, Erikson</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Berlianty, Teng</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ajlani, Riad Al</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Medical Dispute Resolution; Liability; Hospital; Patient;</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Medical dispute resolution in Indonesia remains a significant challenge, particularly regarding the effectiveness of legal mechanisms for both patients and medical professionals. In practice, medical disputes in Indonesia often involve lengthy and complex litigation, as alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has not been fully optimized. This study compares Indonesia’s system with those of Australia and Singapore to identify strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements for Indonesia's legal framework. It employs a normative juridical method and comparative legal analysis, drawing data from legislation and legal literature on medical dispute resolution. The study examines regulations, dispute resolution mechanisms, and legal protections for patients and medical professionals in the three countries. The findings indicate that Australia and Singapore rely more on mediation and reconciliation, which provide faster and more effective resolutions. Meanwhile, Indonesia still depends on litigation, which is often slow and inefficient. To improve medical dispute resolution in Indonesia, strengthening ADR mechanisms by adopting best practices from Australia and Singapore is essential. This would help establish a fairer, more efficient system that better protects both patients and medical professionals.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Gorontalo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2026-07-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/36031</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33756/jlr.v1i2.36031</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jambura Law Review; VOLUME 8 NO. 2 JULY 2026; 621-644</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2656-0461</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-9255</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33756/jlr.v1i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/36031/14530</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Erikson Sihotang, Teng Berlianty, Riad Al Aljani</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>