Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Unmanned Underwater Vehicles and the Normative Gaps of UNCLOS 1982: A Functional and Evolutionary Interpretation

Jambura Law Review · Vol. UME No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 210–228

DOI
10.33756/jlr.v1i1.33300
ISSN
2656-0461, 2654-9255
Terbit
2026-01-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) presents a significant interpretative challenge to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS), a treaty drafted for an era of manned maritime navigation. While UNCLOS regulates ships and warships in detail, it remains silent on autonomous underwater systems. This article addresses the central legal question of whether, and under what conditions, UUVs may be classified as ships or warships under the existing UNCLOS framework. The study adopts a doctrinal legal methodology based on functional interpretation and evolutionary treaty interpretation, informed by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and relevant state practice. Rather than treating technological novelty as a basis for exclusion, the analysis examines whether the functions performed by UUVs—such as navigation, military operations, and marine scientific research—allow their regulation within established UNCLOS categories. The article argues that the legal status of UUVs cannot be determined abstractly, but depends on their operational function and the maritime zone in which they operate. Normatively, the article clarifies the limits of interpretative adaptation under UNCLOS and highlights the risks of fragmented, interest-driven state practice. It concludes that functional and evolutionary interpretation can reduce legal uncertainty, but must be complemented by bilateral and regional cooperative frameworks, including codes of conduct, to ensure regulatory coherence.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

35 penulis · 87 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Indonesia
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Setyo WidagdoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Moh. FadliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Milda IstiqomahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mustafa LutfiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syahriza Alkhoir AnggoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohd Hazmi Mohd RusliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ariesta Wibisono AndityaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Natalia MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prija DjatmikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Priesty Yustika PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sukardi SukardiUniversity of Indonesia1
Diah Pawestri MaharaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mustafa LuthfiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Adi KusumaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lukman Yudho PrakosoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nuddin HarahabAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ikaningtyas IkaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Choirul HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fransiska Ayulistya SusantoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nur KhasanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Achmad Irwan HamzaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tiyas Vika WidyastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
NataliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rika KurniatyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sukarmi SukarmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hassan QaqayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Shinta HadiyantinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dewi CahyandariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Retno Dewi Pulung SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Nyoman NurjayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sequito MonteiroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Unmanned Underwater Vehicles and the Normative Gaps of UNCLOS 1982: A Functional and Evolutionary Interpretation</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Puspitawati, Dhiana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Susanto, Fransiska A.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mohd Rusli, Mohd Hazmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wardana, Rangga Vandy</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">legal regimes; marine technology; unmanned underwater vehicle;warship</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The rapid development of unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) presents a significant interpretative challenge to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS), a treaty drafted for an era of manned maritime navigation. While UNCLOS regulates ships and warships in detail, it remains silent on autonomous underwater systems. This article addresses the central legal question of whether, and under what conditions, UUVs may be classified as ships or warships under the existing UNCLOS framework. The study adopts a doctrinal legal methodology based on functional interpretation and evolutionary treaty interpretation, informed by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and relevant state practice. Rather than treating technological novelty as a basis for exclusion, the analysis examines whether the functions performed by UUVs—such as navigation, military operations, and marine scientific research—allow their regulation within established UNCLOS categories. The article argues that the legal status of UUVs cannot be determined abstractly, but depends on their operational function and the maritime zone in which they operate. Normatively, the article clarifies the limits of interpretative adaptation under UNCLOS and highlights the risks of fragmented, interest-driven state practice. It concludes that functional and evolutionary interpretation can reduce legal uncertainty, but must be complemented by bilateral and regional cooperative frameworks, including codes of conduct, to ensure regulatory coherence.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Gorontalo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2026-01-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/33300</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33756/jlr.v1i1.33300</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jambura Law Review; VOLUME 8 NO. 1 JANUARY 2026; 210-228</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2656-0461</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-9255</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33756/jlr.v1i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/33300/13218</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Dhiana Puspitawati, Fransiska A. Susanto, Mohd Hazmi Rusli, Rangga Vandy Wardana</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>