Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Institutional Configuration and Competence of the Special Judiciary for Regional Election Disputes: A Comparative Study and Prospects for Implementation

Jambura Law Review · Vol. UME No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 493–520

DOI
10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30949
ISSN
2656-0461, 2654-9255
Terbit
2025-07-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The dispute resolution system for Regional Head Elections in Indonesia continues to face challenges related to fragmented authority, inconsistencies in judicial decisions, and procedural limitations, which may lead to legal uncertainty and undermine the legitimacy of election outcomes. This study aims to explore the weaknesses of the existing system and propose a more effective institutional model for resolving Pilkada disputes. Employing a normative legal approach with a comparative study method, this research analyzes electoral judicial systems in Mexico, the Philippines, and Germany to identify institutional principles that can be adapted to the Indonesian legal framework. Additionally, this study examines the national legal framework, including Constitutional Court rulings on Pilkada dispute resolution, to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the current mechanisms. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s Pilkada dispute resolution system still suffers from overlapping jurisdiction among institutions, inconsistencies in judicial rulings, and delays in dispute resolution processes. Comparative analysis suggests that a more integrated system, is more effective in ensuring legal certainty and judicial independence. Therefore, this study recommends the establishment of a specialized judicial body for Pilkada disputes, endowed with exclusive jurisdiction, institutional independence, and a transparent and expedited dispute resolution process. The implications of this research highlight that institutional reform in Pilkada dispute resolution is crucial for enhancing public trust in the electoral judicial system, strengthening electoral democracy, and upholding the rule of law in Indonesia’s Regional Head Elections process.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

24 penulis · 68 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 29 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Pasundan
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • National University of East Timor
  • University of Bengkulu
  • Tadulako University
  • Universiti Utara Malaysia
  • Malikussaleh University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Robi Assadul BahriAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Bunyamin BunyaminUniversitas Pasundan5
Fikri Chandra PermanaUniversitas Pasundan4
Mohd Zakhiri Md NorUniversiti Utara Malaysia3
Robi Asadul BahriAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Mella Ismelina Farma RahayuTarumanagara University3
Anthon Freddy SusantoUniversitas Pasundan3
Zico Junius FernandoUniversity of Bengkulu2
Mukhlis MukhlisMalikussaleh University2
Mohammad Alvi PRATAMAUniversity of Nottingham2
Mohd Kamarulnizam AbdullahNational University of Malaysia2
Lestari SinagaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iskandar IskandarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurhayati MardinTadulako University1
Erwan Adi PriyonoSebelas Maret University1
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniSebelas Maret University1
Muhammad RustamajiSebelas Maret University1
Faris Fachrizal JodiUniversitas Pasundan1
Rd. Dewi Asri YustiaUniversitas Pasundan1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Institutional Configuration and Competence of the Special Judiciary for Regional Election Disputes: A Comparative Study and Prospects for Implementation</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Arifin, Firdaus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Maarif, Ihsanul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suryana, Cece</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sugiarti, Taty</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Murbani, Anastasia Wahyu</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Regional Elections; Electoral Disputes; Electoral Judiciary; Rule of Law; Specialized Judicial Body.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The dispute resolution system for Regional Head Elections in Indonesia continues to face challenges related to fragmented authority, inconsistencies in judicial decisions, and procedural limitations, which may lead to legal uncertainty and undermine the legitimacy of election outcomes. This study aims to explore the weaknesses of the existing system and propose a more effective institutional model for resolving Pilkada disputes. Employing a normative legal approach with a comparative study method, this research analyzes electoral judicial systems in Mexico, the Philippines, and Germany to identify institutional principles that can be adapted to the Indonesian legal framework. Additionally, this study examines the national legal framework, including Constitutional Court rulings on Pilkada dispute resolution, to assess the effectiveness and limitations of the current mechanisms. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s Pilkada dispute resolution system still suffers from overlapping jurisdiction among institutions, inconsistencies in judicial rulings, and delays in dispute resolution processes. Comparative analysis suggests that a more integrated system, is more effective in ensuring legal certainty and judicial independence. Therefore, this study recommends the establishment of a specialized judicial body for Pilkada disputes, endowed with exclusive jurisdiction, institutional independence, and a transparent and expedited dispute resolution process. The implications of this research highlight that institutional reform in Pilkada dispute resolution is crucial for enhancing public trust in the electoral judicial system, strengthening electoral democracy, and upholding the rule of law in Indonesia’s  Regional Head Elections  process.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Gorontalo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2025-07-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/30949</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33756/jlr.v7i2.30949</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jambura Law Review; VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025; 493-520</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2656-0461</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-9255</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33756/jlr.v7i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/30949/11500</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Firdaus Arifin, Ihsanul Maarif, Cece Suryana, Taty Sugiarti, Anastasia Wahyu Murbani</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>