Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Reformulation of the Authority of Judicial Commission: Safeguarding the Future of Indonesian Judicial Power

Jambura Law Review · Vol. UME No. 2 (2023) · hlm. 386–413

DOI
10.33756/jlr.v5i2.24239
ISSN
2656-0461, 2654-9255
Terbit
2023-07-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Jurisdiction of Indonesian judiciary still leaves various polemics, one of which relates to decisions that are antinomian between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. This research aims to describe efforts to resolve these issues through reformulation within the constitution, regarding the supervisory authority of the Judicial Commission in creating harmonization of judicial decisions in the future. This type of research is normative research. The results indicate that reformulation or redefinition of the authority of the Judicial Commission in the constitution is a gateway to optimizing the role of the Judicial Commission as a product of reform in supervising judges in issuing correct, fair, and legal certainty decisions. Regulation through the constitution is an attributive authority in which the formulation of constitutional norms in the chapter on judicial power, particularly Article of the Judicial Commission, should preferably include phrases of "safeguarding" and "upholding" the code of ethics and conduct of judges, as preventive and repressive measures to prevent antinomian decisions between two judicial state institutions from recurring.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 100 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 50 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Gorontalo
  • Abu Dhabi University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • University of Bengkulu
  • Padjadjaran University
  • Tilburg University
  • Sultan Idris Education University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yassine ChamiAbu Dhabi University3
Zulkifley MohamedSultan Idris Education University2
Mohamad Taufiq Zulfikar SarsonState University of Gorontalo2
Evi NoviawatiUniversitas Galuh2
Indra PerwiraPadjadjaran University2
Ali AbdurahmanPadjadjaran University2
Chami YassineAbu Dhabi University2
Dian Ekawaty IsmailState University of Gorontalo2
Mohamad Hidayat MuhtarState University of Gorontalo2
Suwitno Yutye ImranState University of Gorontalo2
Lisnawaty Wadju BaduState University of Gorontalo2
Marah Doly NasutionUniversitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara1
Lukmanul AkhsaniMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto1
Muhammad ArmawadinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Husin HusinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Mulyati AkibUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Nitri MiroseaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Kiki Fatimah SaritaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ramdhan KasimUniversitas Gorontalo1
Andi Inar SahabatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Hatta Roma TampubolonTadulako University1
Mohamad Rivaldi MohaState University of Gorontalo1
Adelia RachmaniarTilburg University1
Asrul Ibrahim NurUniversity of Debrecen1
Amancik AmancikUniversity of Bengkulu1
Sonia Ivana BarusUniversity of Bengkulu1
Putra Perdana Ahmad SaifullohUniversity of Bengkulu1
Weny Almoravid DungaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yassine ChamiAbu Dhabi University1
Ahmad AhmadState University of Gorontalo1
Muhammad MukhtarState University of Gorontalo1
ZULKIFLI ZULKIFLIPoliteknik Negeri Bengkalis1
Mohamad Rivaldi MohaState University of Gorontalo1
Adelia RachmaniarTilburg University1
Muhammad Ridho SinagaNusa Putra University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Reformulation of the Authority of Judicial Commission: Safeguarding the Future of Indonesian Judicial Power</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rasyid, Usman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nggilu, Novendri Mohamad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wantu, Fence</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kaluku, Julisa Aprilia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ahmad, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Reformulation; Judicial Power; Constitution.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Jurisdiction of Indonesian judiciary still leaves various polemics, one of which relates to decisions that are antinomian between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. This research aims to describe efforts to resolve these issues through reformulation within the constitution, regarding the supervisory authority of the Judicial Commission in creating harmonization of judicial decisions in the future. This type of research is normative research. The results indicate that reformulation or redefinition of the authority of the Judicial Commission in the constitution is a gateway to optimizing the role of the Judicial Commission as a product of reform in supervising judges in issuing correct, fair, and legal certainty decisions. Regulation through the constitution is an attributive authority in which the formulation of constitutional norms in the chapter on judicial power, particularly Article of the Judicial Commission, should preferably include phrases of "safeguarding" and "upholding" the code of ethics and conduct of judges, as preventive and repressive measures to prevent antinomian decisions between two judicial state institutions from recurring.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Gorontalo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2023-07-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/24239</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33756/jlr.v5i2.24239</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jambura Law Review; VOLUME 5 NO. 2 JULY 2023; 386-413</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2656-0461</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2654-9255</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33756/jlr.v5i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/article/view/24239/8419</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Usman Rasyid, Novendri Mohamad Nggilu, Fence Wantu, Julisa Aprilia Kaluku, Ahmad</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>