Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

Constructing WH-Questions Througn An Error Analysis at Junior High School of Indonesia

Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018)

DOI
10.31332/lkw.v4i2.852
ISSN
2549-9017, 2460-2280
Published
2018-12-24
Publisher
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This research aims at finding out the types of errors committed by the students in making wh questions. The researcher applies descriptive research. It is used to describe the errors of the students. in making wh-questions. The population of this research is the second year students of SMP Negeri 2 Bua Ponrang. The total number of population in this research is 240 students. The researcher uses purposive sampling technique in determining class VIII A. Therefore, the total number of sample in this research is 28 students. Based on the result of data analysis, the researcher concludes the types of error that the second year students at SMP Negeri 2 Bua Ponrang committed in making wh-questions are omission, simple addition, archi-form, alternating form, misordering, and miselection. The omission is dominant errors that the students made because from 1017 of total errors, 475 or 46.7% of the total errors are omission. Then, it followed by archi-form with the total errors is 275 or 28%, 155 errors of simple addition or 15.2%, 93 errors of misordering or 9.1%, 11 errors of alternating form or 1.1%, and the least types of errors is miselection with 8 errors or 0.8%.

Collaboration network of the authors

15 authors · 20 co-authorship links · 4 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ni Nyoman Triana SuskendarianiAffiliation unknown1
La AgusuAffiliation unknown1
Lina LestariUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Usman UsmanAffiliation unknown1
Pahenra PahenraAffiliation unknown1
La Ode KaimuddinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Wa Ode ReniAffiliation unknown1
Irnawati IrnawatiAffiliation unknown1
La Ode Izzatil HaqqaAffiliation unknown1
Reymon ReymonAffiliation unknown1
Yuliastri Ambar PambudhiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Lisnawati RusminUniversitas Halu Oleo1
H. JamiludinAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2549-9017/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Constructing WH-Questions Througn An Error Analysis at Junior High School of Indonesia</dc:title><dc:creator>Masruddin, Masruddin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Karmila, Karmila</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This research aims at finding out the types of errors committed by the students in making wh questions. The researcher applies descriptive research. It is used to describe the errors of the students. in making wh-questions. The population of this research is the second year students of SMP Negeri 2 Bua Ponrang. The total number of population in this research is 240 students. The researcher uses purposive sampling technique in determining class VIII A. Therefore, the total number of sample in this research is 28 students. Based on the result of data analysis, the researcher concludes the types of error that the second year students at SMP Negeri 2 Bua Ponrang committed in making wh-questions are omission, simple addition, archi-form, alternating form, misordering, and miselection. The omission is dominant errors that the students made because from 1017 of total errors, 475 or 46.7% of the total errors are omission. Then, it followed by archi-form with the total errors is 275 or 28%, 155 errors of simple addition or 15.2%, 93 errors of misordering or 9.1%, 11 errors of alternating form or 1.1%, and the least types of errors is miselection with 8 errors or 0.8%.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2018-12-24</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v4i2.852</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.31332/lkw.v4i2.852</dc:identifier><dc:source>Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English; Vol 4 No 2 (2018); 123</dc:source><dc:source>2549-9017</dc:source><dc:source>2460-2280</dc:source><dc:relation>http://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/langkawi/article/viewFile/852/875</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>