Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 2

Cognitive, Metacognitive, or Social: Which Learning Strategies Do Arabic Language Learners Prefer?

Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English · Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025) · pp. 205–218

DOI
10.31332/lkw.v11i1.11293
ISSN
2549-9017, 2460-2280
Published
2025-07-20
Publisher
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

This research aims to explore how Arabic learners at Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri utilize language learning strategies (LLSs) and whether gender influences their strategic preferences. The participants consisted of 100 students—40 male and 60 female—who completed the Language Learning Strategy Questionnaire (LLSQ) developed by Rita et al. (2019). The instrument asked students to reflect on how frequently they use specific strategies—cognitive, metacognitive, and social—when learning the four core Arabic language skills: speaking, listening, reading, and writing. The findings revealed that cognitive strategies were the most frequently used across most skill areas. Metacognitive strategies appeared more prominently in writing tasks, while social strategies—such as seeking help from peers—were generally used less often. Interestingly, statistical analysis indicated no significant gender differences in strategy use, suggesting that both male and female students approach language learning in relatively similar ways. These patterns point to a strong reliance on task-based strategies, with comparatively less emphasis on reflective or collaborative approaches. In light of these results, educators may consider supporting learners in diversifying their strategy use—particularly by promoting peer interaction and strategic planning behaviors—to foster deeper and more effective language learning.

Collaboration network of the authors

4 authors · 6 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2549-9017/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Cognitive, Metacognitive, or Social: Which Learning Strategies Do Arabic Language Learners Prefer?</dc:title><dc:creator>Sholihah, Diana Nur</dc:creator><dc:creator>Auliya, Lulu Marfuatin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Nabiilah, Salmaa</dc:creator><dc:creator>Alfiyah, Siti Salwa</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This research aims to explore how Arabic learners at Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri utilize language learning strategies (LLSs) and whether gender influences their strategic preferences. The participants consisted of 100 students—40 male and 60 female—who completed the Language Learning Strategy Questionnaire (LLSQ) developed by Rita et al. (2019). The instrument asked students to reflect on how frequently they use specific strategies—cognitive, metacognitive, and social—when learning the four core Arabic language skills: speaking, listening, reading, and writing. The findings revealed that cognitive strategies were the most frequently used across most skill areas. Metacognitive strategies appeared more prominently in writing tasks, while social strategies—such as seeking help from peers—were generally used less often. Interestingly, statistical analysis indicated no significant gender differences in strategy use, suggesting that both male and female students approach language learning in relatively similar ways. These patterns point to a strong reliance on task-based strategies, with comparatively less emphasis on reflective or collaborative approaches. In light of these results, educators may consider supporting learners in diversifying their strategy use—particularly by promoting peer interaction and strategic planning behaviors—to foster deeper and more effective language learning.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-07-20</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v11i1.11293</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.31332/lkw.v11i1.11293</dc:identifier><dc:source>Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English; Vol 11 No 1 (2025); 205-218</dc:source><dc:source>2549-9017</dc:source><dc:source>2460-2280</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/langkawi/article/download/11293/3521</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>