Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 2

Analysis of the Quality of Arabic Language Online Test Items Based on ACTFL Standards

Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 243–256

DOI
10.31332/lkw.v11i2.12047
ISSN
2549-9017, 2460-2280
Terbit
2025-10-01
Penerbit
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the quality of Arabic language online test items at the University of Darussalam Gontor using the standards of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) as a reference for item quality analysis. The item analysis was conducted on three main Arabic language skills: listening, reading, and writing. The University of Darussalam Gontor was selected as it is one of the Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia that is committed to the development of Arabic language. This study employed a descriptive quantitative method. Data were collected through student score documents from Arabic online tests at the University of Darussalam Gontor, consisting of 20 items for the listening test, 29 for the reading test, and 29 for the writing test. The sample was selected using random sampling: 135 students for writing, 127 for listening, and 129 for reading. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results revealed that in terms of validity, the reading skill test showed the highest validity rate at 86%. In terms of reliability, the writing skill test demonstrated the highest reliability. The discrimination index analysis showed that the writing test had the best quality, while the difficulty index analysis indicated that the listening test had a fairly balanced distribution: 50% of items at a medium level, 33% easy, and 17% difficult. Furthermore, the analysis of test items based on ACTFL standards showed that items at the intermediate level still predominated.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 99 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 9 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Darussalam Gontor
  • Leipzig University
  • Muhammadiyah University of Ponorogo
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Taufik Rizki SistaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Siti Anne Barkah Nur FauziahAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Alif Cahya SetiyadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Maghfirotul HasanahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahmat Hidayat LubisAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fakhira Aprilia MiladiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur Fera KhalifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yulianur ZulkarnainAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus YasinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurkholis MajidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
KamaluddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurul Salis AlaminInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci1
Syarifah SyarifahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Riza AshariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Idam MustofaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muassomah MuassomahUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Agus YasinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdul Hafidz bin ZaidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anshar ZulhelmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hasanuddin TosimpakAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Khairul RifqiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti AminahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syamsul AimmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muzaini Nugroho SaputroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad Muzakki DarajatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Siti NurfadlilahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aisyah Dwi Sena DaundiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Risti Nur JuniartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurhidayah Binti Mohd NoorAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aisyah ImaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Chevira Yasin IndriyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rohani PootehAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anhar AnharAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mochammad FirdausAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Azmi ZarkasyiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2549-9017/works, pertama di-harvest 29 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Analysis of the Quality of Arabic Language Online Test Items Based on ACTFL Standards</dc:title><dc:creator>Mahmudi, Ihwan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Muhyiddin, Luthfi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ismail, Moh</dc:creator><dc:creator>Saifulloh, Ahmad</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kusnawan, Wawan</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This study aims to analyze the quality of Arabic language online test items at the University of Darussalam Gontor using the standards of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) as a reference for item quality analysis. The item analysis was conducted on three main Arabic language skills: listening, reading, and writing. The University of Darussalam Gontor was selected as it is one of the Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia that is committed to the development of Arabic language. This study employed a descriptive quantitative method. Data were collected through student score documents from Arabic online tests at the University of Darussalam Gontor, consisting of 20 items for the listening test, 29 for the reading test, and 29 for the writing test. The sample was selected using random sampling: 135 students for writing, 127 for listening, and 129 for reading. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results revealed that in terms of validity, the reading skill test showed the highest validity rate at 86%. In terms of reliability, the writing skill test demonstrated the highest reliability. The discrimination index analysis showed that the writing test had the best quality, while the difficulty index analysis indicated that the listening test had a fairly balanced distribution: 50% of items at a medium level, 33% easy, and 17% difficult. Furthermore, the analysis of test items based on ACTFL standards showed that items at the intermediate level still predominated.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025-10-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v11i2.12047</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.31332/lkw.v11i2.12047</dc:identifier><dc:source>Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English; Vol 11 No 2 (2025); 243-256</dc:source><dc:source>2549-9017</dc:source><dc:source>2460-2280</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/langkawi/article/download/12047/3689</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>