This study analyzes the operational mechanisms of Shopee Paylater and Shopee Paypinjam to evaluate their compliance with Islamic finance principles. The research aims to address critical concerns regarding interest rates, late fees, and transparency, which challenge adherence to Sharia ethics. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing case studies and semi-structured interviews with users, supported by secondary data analysis. Findings reveal significant non-compliance with Islamic finance principles due to the imposition of interest and late payment penalties, both considered forms of riba. Furthermore, ambiguous repayment terms and hidden fees undermine the clarity and fairness central to Islamic financial practices. The study highlights that while these fintech services offer convenience and accessibility, they fail to align with the ethical requirements valued by Muslim consumers. The research contributes to the understanding of fintech’s role in Islamic markets, emphasizing the need for profit-sharing models, enhanced transparency, and Sharia-compliant regulatory frameworks. These findings have practical implications for fintech providers aiming to design ethical financial products, as well as policymakers and Sharia boards seeking to foster trust and inclusion in digital financial ecosystems. Future studies are encouraged to explore comparative analyses across regions and the perspectives of diverse stakeholders.
Collaboration network of the authors
4 authors ·
6 co-authorship links
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar
Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-author
Organisation
Joint articles
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.