Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

A Performance Evaluation of Repetitive and Iterative Learning Algorithms for Periodic Tracking Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation System

Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC) · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024) · hlm. 205–216

DOI
10.18196/jrc.v5i1.20705
ISSN
2715-5072, 2715-5056
Terbit
2024-01-25
Penerbit
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a medical device that delivers electrical pulses to the muscle, allowing patients with spinal cord injuries to perform activities such as walking, cycling, and grasping. It is critical for the FES to generate stimuli with the appropriate controller so that the desired movements can be precisely tracked. By considering the repetitive nature of the movements, the learning-based control algorithms are utilized for regulating the FES. Iterative learning control (ILC) and repetitive control (RC) are two learning algorithms that can be used to accomplish accurate repetitive motions. This study investigates a variety of ILC and RC designs with distinct learning functions; this constitutes our contribution to the field. The FES model of ankle angle, which is in a class of discrete-time linear systems is considered in this study. Two learning functions, i.e., proportional, and zero-phase learning functions, are simulated for the second-order FES model running at a sampling time of 0.1 s. The results indicate the superior performance of the ILC and RC in terms of convergence rate using the zero-phase learning function. ILC and RC with a zero-phase learning function can reach a zero root-mean-square error in two iterations if the model of the plant is correct. This is faster than proportional-based ILC and RC, which takes about 40 iterations. This indicates that the zero-phase learning function requires two iterations to ensure that the patient's ankle angle precisely tracks the intended trajectory. However, the tracking performance is degraded for both control methods, especially when the model is subject to uncertainties. This specific problem can lead to future research directions.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

18 penulis · 67 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 9 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Tampere University
  • University of Indonesia
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Harry SeptantoNational Research and Innovation Agency2
Samsul HafizNational Research and Innovation Agency2
Made Widhi Surya AtmanTampere University2
Oetomo SudjanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Prawito PrajitnoUniversity of Indonesia2
Aulia Siti AisjahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Akif RahmatillahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
SuyantoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jrc/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">A Performance Evaluation of Repetitive and Iterative Learning Algorithms for Periodic Tracking Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation System</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kurniawan, Edi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pratiwi, Enggar B.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Adinanta, Hendra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suryadi, Suryadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Prakosa, Jalu A.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Purwowibowo, Purwowibowo</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wijonarko, Sensus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Maftukhah, Tatik</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rustandi, Dadang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mahmudi, Mahmudi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Perfect Tracking</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Repetitive Control</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Iterative Learning Control</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Learning Function</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Functional Electrical Simulation.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a medical device that delivers electrical pulses to the muscle, allowing patients with spinal cord injuries to perform activities such as walking, cycling, and grasping. It is critical for the FES to generate stimuli with the appropriate controller so that the desired movements can be precisely tracked. By considering the repetitive nature of the movements, the learning-based control algorithms are utilized for regulating the FES. Iterative learning control (ILC) and repetitive control (RC) are two learning algorithms that can be used to accomplish accurate repetitive motions. This study investigates a variety of ILC and RC designs with distinct learning functions; this constitutes our contribution to the field. The FES model of ankle angle, which is in a class of discrete-time linear systems is considered in this study. Two learning functions, i.e., proportional, and zero-phase learning functions, are simulated for the second-order FES model running at a sampling time of 0.1 s. The results indicate the superior performance of the ILC and RC in terms of convergence rate using the zero-phase learning function. ILC and RC with a zero-phase learning function can reach a zero root-mean-square error in two iterations if the model of the plant is correct. This is faster than proportional-based ILC and RC, which takes about 40 iterations. This indicates that the zero-phase learning function requires two iterations to ensure that the patient's ankle angle precisely tracks the intended trajectory. However, the tracking performance is degraded for both control methods, especially when the model is subject to uncertainties. This specific problem can lead to future research directions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-01-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jrc/article/view/20705</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.18196/jrc.v5i1.20705</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC); Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024); 205-216</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-5072</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-5056</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.18196/jrc.v5i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jrc/article/view/20705/8938</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Edi Kurniawan, Enggar B. Pratiwi, Hendra Adinanta, Suryadi, Jalu A. Prakosa, Purwowibowo, Sensus Wijonarko, Tatik Maftukhah, Dadang Rustandi, Mahmudi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>