Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

The process and role of the judiciary in election administration dispute resolution in Indonesia

Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan · Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 334–344

DOI
10.21831/jc.v18i2.44175
ISSN
2541-1918, 1829-5789
Terbit
2021-10-31
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Election administrative violations occur at the time of the implementation of the general election by election organizers and contestants. Sometimes, they do not realize that they have committed a violation. Since the general election during the reformation period after the fall of the New Order in Indonesia, there have been frequent violations of election administration resolved through administrative courts through the State Administrative Court. The dispute resolution was carried out after complaints were made through Bawaslu and DKPP as administrative dispute resolution (ADR) institutions and did not bring results. This administrative violation is considered detrimental to the candidate contesting the election, causing a dispute between the candidate contesting the election and the organizers of the general election. This article examines the process of resolving electoral administrative disputes in Indonesia and the judiciary's role in resolving electoral administrative disputes. Several examples of cases of election administration violations that occurred and their causes obtained through empirical studies using the technique of documenting judges' decisions that have permanent legal force at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia were analyzed using inductive logic.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

9 penulis · 12 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Universitas Jember
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Anita TrisianaUniversitas Slamet Riyadi1
Sutoyo SutoyoUniversitas Jember1
Pratiwi Wahyu WidiartiYogyakarta State University1
Endarwati LiesYogyakarta State University1
Sri HartiniYogyakarta State University1
Fathikah Fauziah HanumYogyakarta State University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The process and role of the judiciary in election administration dispute resolution in Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kusadarini, Eny</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Priyanto, Anang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartini, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">case settlement</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">general election administration</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">justice court proceeding</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Election administrative violations occur at the time of the implementation of the general election by election organizers and contestants. Sometimes, they do not realize that they have committed a violation. Since the general election during the reformation period after the fall of the New Order in Indonesia, there have been frequent violations of election administration resolved through administrative courts through the State Administrative Court. The dispute resolution was carried out after complaints were made through Bawaslu and DKPP as administrative dispute resolution (ADR) institutions and did not bring results.  This administrative violation is considered detrimental to the candidate contesting the election, causing a dispute between the candidate contesting the election and the organizers of the general election. This article examines the process of resolving electoral administrative disputes in Indonesia and the judiciary's role in resolving electoral administrative disputes. Several examples of cases of election administration violations that occurred and their causes obtained through empirical studies using the technique of documenting judges' decisions that have permanent legal force at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia were analyzed using inductive logic.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-10-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/44175</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21831/jc.v18i2.44175</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan; Vol 18, No 2 (2021); 334-344</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-1918</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1829-5789</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/44175/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>