Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Analyzing public sentiment on implementing the presidential threshold in Indonesia's presidential election system

Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan · Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) · hlm. 156–166

DOI
10.21831/jc.v20i1.57295
ISSN
2541-1918, 1829-5789
Terbit
2023-04-30
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The threshold Limits for presidential and vice presidential candidates have been a prominent topic since the introduction of direct presidential elections. Initially, the presidential threshold aimed to determine the candidates competing in the presidential election. However, over time, it has become a subject of prolonged debate, as it was perceived to undermine the rights of individuals in government and impede the principle of equality in democracy. This study utilizes qualitative research methods to gauge public sentiment regarding implementing the presidential threshold in Indonesia's presidential election system after the 2019 election. The research collected data through the Nvivo 12 Plus, utilizing sources such as Twitter (with the hashtag #presidentialthreshold) and online news media outlets, including Kompas, Detik, Tempo, Republika, and TribunNews. The study findings indicate that the percentage requirement is the most frequently discussed topic regarding the presidential threshold. Tempo is the online news media outlet that prominently highlights the issue. The analysis reveals that negative sentiment prevails in public opinion, comprising 63% of responses, while positive sentiment constitutes 37%. Tempo primarily represents positive sentiment, while Republika reflects negative sentiment. Positive public sentiment focuses on parliamentary support, while negative sentiment centers around candidates' opportunities.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

34 penulis · 64 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 12 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
  • National University of Malaysia
  • Universitas Jambi
  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Hasanuddin University
  • State University of Malang
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ridho Al-HamdiMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta2
Muhammad IqbalHasanuddin University2
Muhammad Hazim KhabirMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Lilia HalimNational University of Malaysia1
Hazrati Binti HusninNational University of Malaysia1
Anindya Sabila MaghrizaMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Cicyn RiantoniState University of Malang1
Nehru NehruUniversitas Jambi1
Sri PurwaningsihUniversitas Jambi1
Devie NovallyanUniversitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi1
Fajar RahmantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Moch. Rifqi Mei RedhaMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Irva AnggitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bulya BulyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bustami UsmanUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Muhammad RizkiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Safrizal ZAAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zulfa HarirahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. RafiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Baskoro WicaksonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Cahyadi KurniawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ramadhani RamadhaniUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Syahrial ShaddiqAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endarman SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aprillio Poppy BelladonnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anang SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rossi Maunofa WidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indragus PangestuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yujitia AhdarrijalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analyzing public sentiment on implementing the presidential threshold in Indonesia's presidential election system</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Gustiawan, Randa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rafzan, Rafzan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ropawandi, Doni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suswanta, Suswanta</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pribadi, Ulung</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">presidential election presidential threshold</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">sentiment analysis</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The threshold Limits for presidential and vice presidential candidates have been a prominent topic since the introduction of direct presidential elections. Initially, the presidential threshold aimed to determine the candidates competing in the presidential election. However, over time, it has become a subject of prolonged debate, as it was perceived to undermine the rights of individuals in government and impede the principle of equality in democracy. This study utilizes qualitative research methods to gauge public sentiment regarding implementing the presidential threshold in Indonesia's presidential election system after the 2019 election. The research collected data through the Nvivo 12 Plus, utilizing sources such as Twitter (with the hashtag #presidentialthreshold) and online news media outlets, including Kompas, Detik, Tempo, Republika, and TribunNews. The study findings indicate that the percentage requirement is the most frequently discussed topic regarding the presidential threshold. Tempo is the online news media outlet that prominently highlights the issue. The analysis reveals that negative sentiment prevails in public opinion, comprising 63% of responses, while positive sentiment constitutes 37%. Tempo primarily represents positive sentiment, while Republika reflects negative sentiment. Positive public sentiment focuses on parliamentary support, while negative sentiment centers around candidates' opportunities.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/57295</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21831/jc.v20i1.57295</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan; Vol 20, No 1 (2023); 156-166</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-1918</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1829-5789</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/57295/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>