Child Protection Post the New Marriage Law: How Indonesian Religious Court Interpreting the Urgency in Child-age Marriage

Ilhami, Haniah; Nugraheni, Destri Budi; Wijayanta, Tata

doi:10.29303/ius.v11i1.1054

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Child Protection Post the New Marriage Law: How Indonesian Religious Court Interpreting the Urgency in Child-age Marriage

Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) · Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023) · hlm. 75–95

DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1054
ISSN: 2477-815X, 2303-3827
Terbit: 2023-04-05
Penerbit: Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram
Bahasa: eng
Lisensi: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

The amendment of the Law of Marriage in 2019 introduces the new concept of Dispensation of Marriage by providing some additional provisions: the obligations to provide the urgency of marriage and the specific supporting evidence in proving the urgency. This article aims to examine the interpretations of judges in Religious Court on defining the urgency of child-age marriage and the implementation of the supporting evidence in cases of Dispensation of Marriage. Based on the identification, the author analyzes the main questions about the protection of children's rights on those interpretations. Based on the normative legal research that examines the Rulings of Religious Court on the case of Dispensation of Marriage, this article uses the Nonprobability Sampling techniques, specifically the purposive sampling which refers to certain criteria, the author finds the inconsistencies in the interpretation of the urgency of marriage and the implementation of providing the supporting evidence, which influenced by 2 (two) factors, the Formal Regulation and the principle of judge’s independence. As a result, the author suggests detailed regulations regarding the supporting medical evidence, as well as the improvement of comprehensive and equal understanding for judges about the concept of child protection. Comparing to previous studies, this article shows its originality through a broader object study and comprehensive research analysis with more emphasis on juridical aspect, therefore that arguments and conclusions are built on a strong analytical foundation.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

21 penulis · 39 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 13 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

Universitas Gadjah Mada
University of Brawijaya
Universiti Teknologi MARA
Islamic University of Madinah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Universitas Airlangga
National Central University
Afiliasi tidak diketahui

Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel

Tampilkan sebagai tabel

Rekan penulis	Organisasi	Artikel bersama
Rado Fridsel Leonardus	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	4
Alexander Yovie Pratama Yudha	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	2
Sheva Trisanda Adistia	Universitas Gadjah Mada	2
Hartini Hartini	Universitas Gadjah Mada	1
Rahmawati Mohd Yusoff	Universiti Teknologi MARA	1
Maharani Christy Anggraeni	Universitas Gadjah Mada	1
Ja’far Al Dzahaby	Islamic University of Madinah	1
Wahyudi Kurniawan	Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang	1
Bambang Eryanto Hermawan	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Sujayadi Sujayadi	Universitas Airlangga	1
Herliana	Universitas Gadjah Mada	1
Faizin Sulistio	University of Brawijaya	1
Bambang Sugiri	University of Brawijaya	1
Yonatan	University of Brawijaya	1
Sukarmi	University of Brawijaya	1
Budi Hermawan	Afiliasi tidak diketahui	1
Ari Hernawan	National Central University	1
Niken Subekti Budi Utami	Universitas Gadjah Mada	1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.

Metadata asli (oai_dc)

<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Child Protection Post the New Marriage Law: How Indonesian Religious Court Interpreting the Urgency in Child-age Marriage</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Ilhami, Haniah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nugraheni, Destri Budi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator> Wijayanta, Tata</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Child-age Marriage</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Dispensation of Marriage</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Religious Court</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The amendment of the Law of Marriage in 2019 introduces the new concept of Dispensation of Marriage by providing some additional provisions: the obligations to provide the urgency of marriage and the specific supporting evidence in proving the urgency. This article aims to examine the interpretations of judges in Religious Court on defining the urgency of child-age marriage and the implementation of the supporting evidence in cases of Dispensation of Marriage. Based on the identification, the author analyzes the main questions about the protection of children's rights on those interpretations. Based on the normative legal research that examines the Rulings of Religious Court on the case of Dispensation of Marriage, this article uses the Nonprobability Sampling techniques, specifically the purposive sampling which refers to certain criteria, the author finds the inconsistencies in the interpretation of the urgency of marriage and the implementation of providing the supporting evidence, which influenced by 2 (two) factors,  the Formal Regulation and the principle of judge’s independence. As a result, the author suggests detailed regulations regarding the supporting medical evidence, as well as the improvement of comprehensive and equal understanding for judges about the concept of child protection. Comparing to previous studies, this article shows its originality through a broader object study and comprehensive research analysis with more emphasis on juridical aspect, therefore that arguments and conclusions are built on a strong analytical foundation.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-04-05</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-Reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1054</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29303/ius.v11i1.1054</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; 75-95</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2477-815X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2303-3827</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1054/567</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Haniah Ilhami, Destri Budi Nugraheni, Tata Wijayanta</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>