The Concept and Legal Protection Regarding Government Administrative Actions in the Form of Not Performing Concrete Actions (Omission)

Asimah, Dewi; Erliyana, Anna

doi:10.29303/ius.v13i3.1520

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

The Concept and Legal Protection Regarding Government Administrative Actions in the Form of Not Performing Concrete Actions (Omission)

Konsep dan Perlindungan Hukum atas Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan Berupa Tidak Melakukan Perbuatan Konkret (Omission)

Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) · Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025) · hlm. 708–733

DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1520
ISSN: 2477-815X, 2303-3827
Terbit: 2025-12-24
Penerbit: Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram
Bahasa: eng
Lisensi: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

After the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration (Government Administration Law or abbreviated as UU AP in Indonesian) and Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 of 2019, the authority of the Administrative Judiciary has expanded. The Administrative Judiciary adjudicates disputes related to administrative decisions and handles disputes related to government administrative actions (Factual Conduct). Actions that can be sued include active (performing concrete/Factual Conduct - commission) and passive (not performing concrete/Factual Conduct-omission) actions. Although Government Administration Law and Supreme Court Regulation do not provide detailed explanations regarding the meaning and criteria of passive government actions, based on studies, several criteria can be used to assess whether passive government actions can be considered unlawful. These criteria include the existence of a legal obligation that must be performed by an administrative official. The action is within the scope of their authority, the official intentionally does not fulfill the obligation, the action violates legislation and legal obligations, or the plaintiff’s subjective rights, and the existence of a permissible claim for actual damages. In terms of legal protection, citizens can file a lawsuit in the Administrative Court against the failure of a government body or official to perform a concrete action. However, in practice, various problems still arise, such as the time limit for filing lawsuits, the obligation to pursue administrative remedies first, and issues related to the tacit authorization concept.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

8 penulis · 14 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 12 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

University of Indonesia
Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
State University of Semarang
Universiti Muhammadiyah Malaysia
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta

Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel

Tampilkan sebagai tabel

Rekan penulis	Organisasi	Artikel bersama
Mutiara Dwi Sari	Universiti Muhammadiyah Malaysia	1
Ali Masyhar Mursyid	State University of Semarang	1
Ferry Fathurokhman	Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University	1
Iren Sudarya	Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University	1
Fathudin	Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta	1
Dian Puji N. Simatupang	University of Indonesia	1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.

Metadata asli (oai_dc)

<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Concept and Legal Protection Regarding Government Administrative Actions in the Form of Not Performing Concrete Actions (Omission)</dc:title>
	<dc:title xml:lang="id-ID">Konsep dan Perlindungan Hukum atas Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan Berupa Tidak Melakukan Perbuatan Konkret (Omission)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Asimah, Dewi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Erliyana, Anna</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Concrete Actions</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Government Administrative Actions</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Factual Conduct</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Passive Actions</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Perbuatan Konkret</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Tindakan Faktual</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Tindakan Pasif</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id-ID">Perlindungan Hukum</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">After the enactment of Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration (Government Administration Law or abbreviated as UU AP in Indonesian) and Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 2 of 2019, the authority of the Administrative Judiciary has expanded. The Administrative Judiciary adjudicates disputes related to administrative decisions and handles disputes related to government administrative actions (Factual Conduct). Actions that can be sued include active (performing concrete/Factual Conduct - commission) and passive (not performing concrete/Factual Conduct-omission) actions. Although Government Administration Law and Supreme Court Regulation do not provide detailed explanations regarding the meaning and criteria of passive government actions, based on studies, several criteria can be used to assess whether passive government actions can be considered unlawful. These criteria include the existence of a legal obligation that must be performed by an administrative official. The action is within the scope of their authority, the official intentionally does not fulfill the obligation, the action violates legislation and legal obligations, or the plaintiff’s subjective rights, and the existence of a permissible claim for actual damages. In terms of legal protection, citizens can file a lawsuit in the Administrative Court against the failure of a government body or official to perform a concrete action. However, in practice, various problems still arise, such as the time limit for filing lawsuits, the obligation to pursue administrative remedies first, and issues related to the tacit authorization concept.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-Reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1520</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29303/ius.v13i3.1520</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; 708-733</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2477-815X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2303-3827</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.29303/ius.v13i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1520/689</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Dewi Asimah, Anna Erliyana</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>