Implications of Constitutional Defiance of Constitutional Court Decisions by Lawmakers

Pratiwi, Wiwit; Isra, Saldi; Simabura, Charles; Fahmi, Khairul

doi:10.29303/ius.v13i3.1837

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Implications of Constitutional Defiance of Constitutional Court Decisions by Lawmakers

Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) · Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025) · hlm. 734–759

DOI: 10.29303/ius.v13i3.1837
ISSN: 2477-815X, 2303-3827
Terbit: 2025-12-24
Penerbit: Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram
Bahasa: eng
Lisensi: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Law Examination, when associated in the context of upholding the supremacy of the constitution, does not only stop at canceling a norm of law that is contrary to the constitution, but also how the cancellation decision is then obeyed and implemented. This is because the nature of the Constitutional Court Decision is final and binding. The problem that then arises is when looking at the final and binding nature of the Constitutional Court Decision from the aspect of law in action. It is still found that the Constitutional Court’s decision is not implemented consequently by the legislators, namely by reviving the norms that the Constitutional Court has annulled in the laws to be formed or new laws. The research method used is a normative legal method, which is carried out by collecting primary, secondary, and or tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the final and binding nature of Constitutional Court decisions erga omnes requires all state institutions to consider the annulled norms as invalid and to follow up on them without exception. However, the study found that constitutional defiance still occurs in the form of disregard or revival of norms that have been declared unconstitutional, which triggers legal uncertainty and weakens the authority of the constitution. Therefore, stronger implementation mechanisms are needed, including post-decision compliance, constitutional impact assessment, continuous monitoring, and the application of a judicial preview model to ensure the effectiveness of Constitutional Court decisions.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

23 penulis · 51 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 36 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

Andalas University
University of Bengkulu
University of Indonesia
William & Mary
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Hasanuddin University
Universitas Jambi
Organisasi lain

Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel

Tampilkan sebagai tabel

Rekan penulis	Organisasi	Artikel bersama
Zainal Arifin Mochtar	Universitas Gadjah Mada	2
Zulkifli Aspan	Hasanuddin University	2
Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali	Dhofar University	2
I Dewa Gede Palguna	Udayana University	2
Rahmat Bagja	Andalas University	2
Asrul Ibrahim Nur	University of Debrecen	2
Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh	University of Bengkulu	2
Yuliandri Yuliandri	Andalas University	2
Ferdi Ferdi	Andalas University	1
Hilaire Tegnan	William & Mary	1
Muhammad Ridwansyah	Universitas Jambi	1
Enny Nurbaningsih	Andalas University	1
Khairul Fahmi	Andalas University	1
Zico Junius Fernando	University of Bengkulu	1
Jaco Barkhuizen	University of Limpopo	1
Sherly Nelsa Fitri	Universitas Prof. Dr. Hazairin SH.	1
Qurrata Ayuni	University of Indonesia	1
Satrio Alif Febriyanto	University of Indonesia	1
Nurizal Ismail	International Islamic University Malaysia	1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.

Metadata asli (oai_dc)

<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Implications of Constitutional Defiance of Constitutional Court Decisions by Lawmakers</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Pratiwi, Wiwit</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Isra, Saldi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Simabura, Charles</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fahmi, Khairul</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Defiance of the Constitution</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Erga Omnes</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Final and Binding</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Lawmakers</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Law Examination, when associated in the context of upholding the supremacy of the constitution, does not only stop at canceling a norm of law that is contrary to the constitution, but also how the cancellation decision is then obeyed and implemented. This is because the nature of the Constitutional Court Decision is final and binding. The problem that then arises is when looking at the final and binding nature of the Constitutional Court Decision from the aspect of law in action. It is still found that the Constitutional Court’s decision is not implemented consequently by the legislators, namely by reviving the norms that the Constitutional Court has annulled in the laws to be formed or new laws. The research method used is a normative legal method, which is carried out by collecting primary, secondary, and or tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the final and binding nature of Constitutional Court decisions erga omnes requires all state institutions to consider the annulled norms as invalid and to follow up on them without exception. However, the study found that constitutional defiance still occurs in the form of disregard or revival of norms that have been declared unconstitutional, which triggers legal uncertainty and weakens the authority of the constitution. Therefore, stronger implementation mechanisms are needed, including post-decision compliance, constitutional impact assessment, continuous monitoring, and the application of a judicial preview model to ensure the effectiveness of Constitutional Court decisions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-Reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1837</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29303/ius.v13i3.1837</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; 734-759</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2477-815X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2303-3827</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.29303/ius.v13i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1837/692</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Wiwit Pratiwi, Saldi Isra, Charles Simabura, Khairul Fahmi</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>