Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

The Challenge of Admitting Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law

Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) · Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025) · hlm. 656–680

DOI
10.29303/ius.v13i3.1873
ISSN
2477-815X, 2303-3827
Terbit
2025-12-25
Penerbit
Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

In the digital age, the use of electronic evidence in civil disputes has become increasingly common. However, judges often face significant challenges in accepting and evaluating electronic evidence due to concerns about its authenticity, integrity, and relevance. This paper examines the factors contributing to judicial doubts regarding electronic evidence in Indonesian civil litigation and explores the implications of such doubts on the resolution of legal disputes. Drawing on case law, legal theory, and practical challenges, the paper identifies key issues such as the ease of manipulation, lack of standardized procedures for collecting and preserving digital evidence, and the limited understanding of technology among many judges. These factors create a significant barrier to the effective use of electronic evidence in court, leading to delays, case dismissals, or unjust outcomes. The paper also discusses potential solutions to overcome these challenges, including the need for clearer legal frameworks, the role of forensic digital experts, and judicial education in information technology. By addressing these concerns, this paper aims to highlight the critical importance of building trust in electronic evidence, ensuring its proper use in civil dispute resolution, and promoting a more efficient and fair legal process. Ultimately, the study proposes strategies to strengthen the role of electronic evidence in Indonesian civil law while maintaining judicial integrity and ensuring the protection of all parties involved.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 184 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Newcastle Australia
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Anis WidyawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui14
Rasdi RasdiAfiliasi tidak diketahui14
Waspiah WaspiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui14
Riska AlkadriAfiliasi tidak diketahui11
Dian LatifianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Ngboawaji Daniel NteAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Indah Sri UtariAfiliasi tidak diketahui10
Rodiyah RodiyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Septhian Eka AdiyatmaAfiliasi tidak diketahui9
Nadiyah Meyliana PutriAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Ali MasyharAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Muhammad Iqbal BaiquniAfiliasi tidak diketahui8
Nurul FibriantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Bayangsari WedhatamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
Rosyidi HamzahAfiliasi tidak diketahui7
John WoodwardUniversity of Newcastle Australia7
R Benny RiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Asyaffa Ridzqi AmandhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Siti Hafsyah IdrisAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Riki JuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Muhammad Azil MaskurAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Sonny Saptoajie WicaksonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Karsinah KarsinahAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Bintang Rafli AnantaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Fitria DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Muhammad Wahyu Saiful HudaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ngaboawaji Daniel NteAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ahsana NadiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Asmarani RamliAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Dewi Puspa SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Layla Putri AulyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Robert Brian SmithAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Raden Muhammad Arvy IlyasaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Heni RosidaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Challenge of Admitting Electronic Evidence in Civil Procedure Law</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rahmawati, Ema</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suparman, Eman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Arifin, Ridwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ezzerouali, Souad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Civil Procedure</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Challenge of Admitting</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Electronic Evidence</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">In the digital age, the use of electronic evidence in civil disputes has become increasingly common. However, judges often face significant challenges in accepting and evaluating electronic evidence due to concerns about its authenticity, integrity, and relevance. This paper examines the factors contributing to judicial doubts regarding electronic evidence in Indonesian civil litigation and explores the implications of such doubts on the resolution of legal disputes. Drawing on case law, legal theory, and practical challenges, the paper identifies key issues such as the ease of manipulation, lack of standardized procedures for collecting and preserving digital evidence, and the limited understanding of technology among many judges. These factors create a significant barrier to the effective use of electronic evidence in court, leading to delays, case dismissals, or unjust outcomes. The paper also discusses potential solutions to overcome these challenges, including the need for clearer legal frameworks, the role of forensic digital experts, and judicial education in information technology. By addressing these concerns, this paper aims to highlight the critical importance of building trust in electronic evidence, ensuring its proper use in civil dispute resolution, and promoting a more efficient and fair legal process. Ultimately, the study proposes strategies to strengthen the role of electronic evidence in Indonesian civil law while maintaining judicial integrity and ensuring the protection of all parties involved.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-12-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-Reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1873</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29303/ius.v13i3.1873</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan; 656-680</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2477-815X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2303-3827</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.29303/ius.v13i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/1873/694</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Fadhel Arjuna Adinda, Ema Rahmawati, Eman Suparman, Ridwan Arifin, Souad Ezzerouali</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>