Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

Social Recognition and Legal Certainty in Informal Land Transactions through Ḥifẓ al-MālI

Fawaid: Sharia Economic Law Review · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026) · pp. 129–148

DOI
10.31332/flr.v8i2.15509
ISSN
2828-576X, 2828-4593
Published
2026-10-20
Publisher
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

Shocking Line: Land ownership may be socially recognized and economically valuable, yet informal transactions can leave legitimate property interests vulnerable to legal uncertainty and competing ownership claims. Purpose of the study: This study examines the practices, ownership origins, documentary evidence, motivations, and perceived risks of unregistered land transactions in Tampo, Indonesia, and evaluates their implications for legitimate ownership, legal certainty, dispute prevention, and public welfare through the principle of ḥifẓ al-māl. Methods: Employing a normative–empirical legal design, this study integrates socio-legal inquiry with Islamic legal analysis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 13 purposively selected informants, observations, and documentation during March–May 2026. Qualitative analysis involved data reduction, thematic presentation, conclusion verification, and triangulation across sources, methods, and collection periods. Findings and discussion: The findings reveal that informal land transfers rely on inheritance, cultivation, previous purchases, interpersonal trust, and varying documentary evidence. Although negotiated consent and community recognition support transactional legitimacy, incomplete ownership verification exposes buyers to potential disputes. From a ḥifẓ al-māl perspective, substantive property protection may coexist with institutional deficiencies that undermine enduring legal certainty. Implication and Contribution: This study proposes a two-dimensional analytical framework integrating substantive property protection and institutional legal protection. It contributes empirical evidence of the gap between socially recognized ownership and legal security while demonstrating the value of integrating socio-legal and Islamic normative analysis. The findings support accessible land registration, reliable ownership verification, and community-based dispute prevention. Keywords: Ḥifẓ al-Māl; Informal Land Transactions; Legal Certainty.

Collaboration network of the authors

3 authors · 3 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • Samarkand branch of Tashkent State University of Economics
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2828-576X/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Social Recognition and Legal Certainty in Informal Land Transactions through Ḥifẓ al-MālI</dc:title><dc:creator>Linda Cahayani</dc:creator><dc:creator>Irabiah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bobur Sobirov</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Shocking Line: Land ownership may be socially recognized and economically valuable, yet informal transactions can leave legitimate property interests vulnerable to legal uncertainty and competing ownership claims.
Purpose of the study: This study examines the practices, ownership origins, documentary evidence, motivations, and perceived risks of unregistered land transactions in Tampo, Indonesia, and evaluates their implications for legitimate ownership, legal certainty, dispute prevention, and public welfare through the principle of ḥifẓ al-māl.
Methods: Employing a normative–empirical legal design, this study integrates socio-legal inquiry with Islamic legal analysis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 13 purposively selected informants, observations, and documentation during March–May 2026. Qualitative analysis involved data reduction, thematic presentation, conclusion verification, and triangulation across sources, methods, and collection periods.
Findings and discussion: The findings reveal that informal land transfers rely on inheritance, cultivation, previous purchases, interpersonal trust, and varying documentary evidence. Although negotiated consent and community recognition support transactional legitimacy, incomplete ownership verification exposes buyers to potential disputes. From a ḥifẓ al-māl perspective, substantive property protection may coexist with institutional deficiencies that undermine enduring legal certainty.
Implication and Contribution: This study proposes a two-dimensional analytical framework integrating substantive property protection and institutional legal protection. It contributes empirical evidence of the gap between socially recognized ownership and legal security while demonstrating the value of integrating socio-legal and Islamic normative analysis. The findings support accessible land registration, reliable ownership verification, and community-based dispute prevention.
Keywords: Ḥifẓ al-Māl; Informal Land Transactions; Legal Certainty.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-10-20</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.31332/flr.v8i2.15509</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.31332/flr.v8i2.15509</dc:identifier><dc:source>Fawaid: Sharia Economic Law Review; Vol 8 No 2 (2026); 129-148</dc:source><dc:source>2828-576X</dc:source><dc:source>2828-4593</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/fawaid/article/download/15509/4256</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>