Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

Oral Contracts and Legal Certainty in Malleleng under al-ʿĀdah al-Muḥakkamah

Fawaid: Sharia Economic Law Review · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026) · pp. 112–128

DOI
10.31332/flr.v8i2.15580
ISSN
2828-576X, 2828-4593
Published
2026-10-20
Publisher
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

Shocking Line: Oral agreements sustain traditional agricultural cooperation, yet their reliance on trust and unwritten obligations raises critical questions about contractual validity, legal certainty, and dispute resolution. Purpose of the study: This study examines the formation, implementation, and dispute resolution of oral agreements within the malleleng tradition in Kolaka, Indonesia, and evaluates their validity through Islamic contract theory (naẓariyyat al-ʿaqd) and the legal maxim al-ʿĀdah al-Muḥakkamah. Methods: Employing descriptive qualitative field research, data were collected through interviews with five purposively selected informants, observations, and documentation in Tolowe Ponre Waru Village. Data were analyzed through reduction, display, and conclusion drawing, supported by triangulation and normative assessment based on Islamic contractual requirements and customary legal principles. Findings and discussion: The findings reveal that malleleng agreements are established through oral consent, sustained by interpersonal trust, and resolved through customary deliberation. Although these arrangements may satisfy Islamic contractual requirements, undocumented obligations generate evidentiary uncertainty when disputes arise. Customary recognition supports their legitimacy but cannot substitute for contractual clarity, demonstrating the distinction between substantive validity and evidentiary reliability. Implication and Contribution: The study proposes an integrated framework connecting contractual validity, customary normative legitimacy, and evidentiary certainty. It contributes empirical insights into trust-based agricultural cooperation and demonstrates the value of integrating qualitative inquiry with Islamic legal analysis. Practically, simplified documentation may strengthen contractual protection without undermining customary autonomy, social trust, or mutual assistance. Keywords: Al-ʿĀdah al-Muḥakkamah; Malleleng; Islamic Contract Law; Legal Certainty; Oral Agreements.

Collaboration network of the authors

7 authors · 12 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Sulawesi Barat
  • Federal College of Education, Iwo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sulaeman SulaemanUniversitas Sulawesi Barat1
Andi Dewi PratiwiUniversitas Sulawesi Barat1
Nur Siti AisyahUniversitas Sulawesi Barat1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2828-576X/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Oral Contracts and Legal Certainty in Malleleng under al-ʿĀdah al-Muḥakkamah</dc:title><dc:creator>Ihsan, Irfan</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ika Novitasari</dc:creator><dc:creator>Syamsul Darlis</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sulyman Muhammad-Busayri</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Shocking Line: Oral agreements sustain traditional agricultural cooperation, yet their reliance on trust and unwritten obligations raises critical questions about contractual validity, legal certainty, and dispute resolution.
Purpose of the study: This study examines the formation, implementation, and dispute resolution of oral agreements within the malleleng tradition in Kolaka, Indonesia, and evaluates their validity through Islamic contract theory (naẓariyyat al-ʿaqd) and the legal maxim al-ʿĀdah al-Muḥakkamah.
Methods: Employing descriptive qualitative field research, data were collected through interviews with five purposively selected informants, observations, and documentation in Tolowe Ponre Waru Village. Data were analyzed through reduction, display, and conclusion drawing, supported by triangulation and normative assessment based on Islamic contractual requirements and customary legal principles.
Findings and discussion: The findings reveal that malleleng agreements are established through oral consent, sustained by interpersonal trust, and resolved through customary deliberation. Although these arrangements may satisfy Islamic contractual requirements, undocumented obligations generate evidentiary uncertainty when disputes arise. Customary recognition supports their legitimacy but cannot substitute for contractual clarity, demonstrating the distinction between substantive validity and evidentiary reliability.
Implication and Contribution: The study proposes an integrated framework connecting contractual validity, customary normative legitimacy, and evidentiary certainty. It contributes empirical insights into trust-based agricultural cooperation and demonstrates the value of integrating qualitative inquiry with Islamic legal analysis. Practically, simplified documentation may strengthen contractual protection without undermining customary autonomy, social trust, or mutual assistance.
Keywords: Al-ʿĀdah al-Muḥakkamah; Malleleng; Islamic Contract Law; Legal Certainty; Oral Agreements.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-10-20</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.31332/flr.v8i2.15580</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.31332/flr.v8i2.15580</dc:identifier><dc:source>Fawaid: Sharia Economic Law Review; Vol 8 No 2 (2026); 112-128</dc:source><dc:source>2828-576X</dc:source><dc:source>2828-4593</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/fawaid/article/download/15580/4257</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>