Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Performance, carcass precentages and heterosis values, Alabio and Cihateup line and crossbreeding on eight week old

Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner · Vol. 16 No. 2 (2012)

DOI
10.14334/jitv.v16i2.638
ISSN
2252-696X, 0853-7380
Terbit
2012-04-14
Penerbit
APPERTANI
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

One effort for improving the productivity of Indonesian local ducks in particular as a meat types is by crossing among the local ducks. Crossbreeding is a fast breeding program for improving some commercial traits. Crossing between two lines or different breed are often used in production systems to utilized the advantage of heterosis (hybrid vigor). Crossbreeding is expected to produce new synthetic strains of duck that perform better than their parents. This study aims to utilize the heterosis and determine best cross, and to study the performance changes due to crossbreeding. The statistical design used in this study was a randomized complete design (RCD) consisting of 4 treatments with 6 replications, each replication consisting of five ducks. The treatments used were the crossing of the pure Cihateup ♂ x Cihateup ♀ (CC), line Alabio ♂ x Alabio ♀ (AA), Alabio ♂ x Cihateup ♀ (AC) cross as well as Cihateup ♂ x Alabio ♀ (CA) cross. This study using male ducklings first hybrid (F1). The results show that the CA is better than AC in the final live weight (7.05%), weight gain (7.32%), carcass weight (9.24%) and carcass yield (2.55%). Fleshy carcass cuts such as breast meat of AA (6.13%) is better when compared to the others, but the highest percentage of meat percentage of the thigh is the AC (10.13%). Duck crossesing CA possess superior properties more and economic value compared with the duck AC. Key Words: Alabio Duck, Cihateup Duck, Crossing, Heterosis, Performance

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 111 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 35 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • IPB University
  • Bandung Institute of Technology
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Universitas Djuanda
  • Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan
  • Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Cece SumantriIPB University10
Jakaria JakariaIPB University8
SubandriyoUniversitas Djuanda5
Rudy PriyantoIPB University4
Eko HandiwirawanNational Research and Innovation Agency4
Ismeth InounuIPB University4
L. Hardi PrasetyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
P.P KetarenAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Wasmen ManaluIPB University3
Ikhsan SuhendroIPB University3
Iman SupriatnaIPB University3
Maijon PurbaAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Bambang Ngaji UtomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
E.D GunardiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Bess TiesnamurtiPusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan2
Asep GunawanIPB University2
Paini Sri WidyawatiUniversitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya2
Dondin SajuthiIPB University2
Olivia YofanandaIPB University1
Hanifah Nuryani LioeIPB University1
Sobir SobirIPB University1
Tjahja MuhandriIPB University1
Mega SafithriIPB University1
Monita RekasihIPB University1
Ika Dewi AnaUniversitas Gadjah Mada1
Anggraini BarlianBandung Institute of Technology1
Rizka Musdalifah AmsarBandung Institute of Technology1
Triati Dewi Kencana WunguBandung Institute of Technology1
Salindri PrawitasariBandung Institute of Technology1
Diah RatnadewiIPB University1
Paramita Sadha Dayinta RukmiIPB University1
Dalilah RamadhaniIPB University1
Anik Budhi DharmayanthiNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Florensia Irena NapitupuluIPB University1
Sekar SulistiyaniIPB University1
Endang PrangdimurtiIPB University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://medpub.appertani.org/index.php/jitv/oai, pertama di-harvest 9 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 9 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Performance, carcass precentages and heterosis values, Alabio and Cihateup line and crossbreeding on eight week old</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Matitaputty, P.R.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Noor, R.R.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hardjosworo, P.S.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wijaya, C.H.</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">One effort for improving the productivity of Indonesian local ducks in particular as a meat types is by crossing among the local ducks. Crossbreeding is a fast breeding program for improving some commercial traits. Crossing between two lines or different breed are often used in production systems to utilized the advantage of heterosis (hybrid vigor). Crossbreeding is expected to produce new synthetic strains of duck that perform better than their parents. This study aims to utilize the heterosis and determine best cross, and to study the performance changes due to crossbreeding. The statistical design used in this study was a randomized complete design (RCD) consisting of 4 treatments with 6 replications, each replication consisting of five ducks. The treatments used were the crossing of the pure Cihateup ♂ x Cihateup ♀ (CC), line Alabio ♂ x Alabio ♀ (AA), Alabio ♂ x Cihateup ♀ (AC) cross as well as Cihateup ♂ x Alabio ♀ (CA) cross. This study using male ducklings first hybrid (F1). The results show that the CA is better than AC in the final live weight (7.05%), weight gain (7.32%), carcass weight (9.24%) and carcass yield (2.55%). Fleshy carcass cuts such as breast meat of AA (6.13%) is better when compared to the others, but the highest percentage of meat percentage of the thigh is the AC (10.13%). Duck crossesing CA possess superior properties more and economic value compared with the duck AC. Key Words: Alabio Duck, Cihateup Duck, Crossing, Heterosis, Performance</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">APPERTANI</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2012-04-14</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://medpub.appertani.org/index.php/jitv/article/view/638</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.14334/jitv.v16i2.638</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner; Vol 16, No 2 (2011): JUNE 2011; p.90-97</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-696X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0853-7380</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://medpub.appertani.org/index.php/jitv/article/view/638/647</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 1970 Indonesian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>