Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

Electronic Evidence and the Transformation of Proof in Islamic Divorce Proceedings: A Narrative Review of Evidentiary Practices in Digital Family Law

Kalosara: Family Law Review · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026) · pp. 256–283

DOI
10.31332/kalosara.v6i2.15637
ISSN
2807-2162, 2807-3177
Published
2026-10-09
Publisher
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The study has mainly examined the admissibility of electronic evidence, but have not sufficiently explained how digital evidence transforms the broader architecture of proof in Islamic divorce adjudication. Their growing use, however, raises more complex questions than formal admissibility alone, particularly concerning authenticity, integrity, reliability, relevance, and evidentiary weight. This article examines the forms and functions of electronic evidence in divorce proceedings and analyzes how its use transforms evidentiary practices from the perspective of Islamic family law. The study employs a narrative literature review of fifteen studies published between 2020 and 2025, comprising literature on electronic evidence, digital family law, divorce adjudication, and judicial reasoning. The selected studies were analyzed through thematic coding, categorization, comparison, and synthesis. The findings show that electronic evidence performs documentary, confirmatory, reconstructive, contextual, and procedural functions in establishing marital facts. More importantly, the literature demonstrates a shift from the formal recognition of digital materials toward increasingly demanding processes of authentication, contextual interpretation, corroboration, and judicial evaluation. This shift transforms evidentiary practices at material, procedural, and evaluative levels. From an Islamic family law perspective, electronic evidence may support judicial fact-finding when its use preserves authenticity, reliability, proportionality, evidentiary fairness, and the parties’ right to examine and challenge the evidence. This study contributes to contemporary Islamic family law scholarship by reconceptualizing electronic evidence as not merely a new form of proof, but as a transformation in how marital facts are constructed and assessed in divorce adjudication. Keywords: Digital Evidence; Divorce Proceedings; Electronic Evidence; Evidentiary Transformation; Islamic Family Law.

Collaboration network of the authors

13 authors · 31 co-authorship links · 15 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare
  • Universitas Cokroaminoto Makassar
  • University of Aberdeen
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Rifaldi RifaldiUniversitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar1
Muammar Muh. BakryUniversitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar1
Zulhas'ari MustafaAffiliation unknown1
Mulham Jaki AstiUniversitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar1
Muhammad Majdy AmiruddinInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare1
Islamul HaqAffiliation unknown1
M. Ali Rusdi BedongInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2807-2162/works, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Electronic Evidence and the Transformation of Proof in Islamic Divorce Proceedings: A Narrative Review of Evidentiary Practices in Digital Family Law</dc:title><dc:creator>Rusli, Muhammad</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ifna, Nur</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ramli, Arif Rahman</dc:creator><dc:creator>Laelah, Ariesthina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Syatar, Abdul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hasanuddin, Muhammad Irfan</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;The study has mainly examined the admissibility of electronic evidence, but have not sufficiently explained how digital evidence transforms the broader architecture of proof in Islamic divorce adjudication. Their growing use, however, raises more complex questions than formal admissibility alone, particularly concerning authenticity, integrity, reliability, relevance, and evidentiary weight. This article examines the forms and functions of electronic evidence in divorce proceedings and analyzes how its use transforms evidentiary practices from the perspective of Islamic family law. The study employs a narrative literature review of fifteen studies published between 2020 and 2025, comprising literature on electronic evidence, digital family law, divorce adjudication, and judicial reasoning. The selected studies were analyzed through thematic coding, categorization, comparison, and synthesis. The findings show that electronic evidence performs documentary, confirmatory, reconstructive, contextual, and procedural functions in establishing marital facts. More importantly, the literature demonstrates a shift from the formal recognition of digital materials toward increasingly demanding processes of authentication, contextual interpretation, corroboration, and judicial evaluation. This shift transforms evidentiary practices at material, procedural, and evaluative levels. From an Islamic family law perspective, electronic evidence may support judicial fact-finding when its use preserves authenticity, reliability, proportionality, evidentiary fairness, and the parties’ right to examine and challenge the evidence. This study contributes to contemporary Islamic family law scholarship by reconceptualizing electronic evidence as not merely a new form of proof, but as a transformation in how marital facts are constructed and assessed in divorce adjudication.
Keywords: Digital Evidence; Divorce Proceedings; Electronic Evidence; Evidentiary Transformation; Islamic Family Law.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-10-09</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.31332/kalosara.v6i2.15637</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.31332/kalosara.v6i2.15637</dc:identifier><dc:source>KALOSARA: Family Law Review; Vol 6 No 2 (2026); 256-283</dc:source><dc:source>2807-2162</dc:source><dc:source>2807-3177</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/index.php/kalosara/article/download/15637/4247</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>