Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Psychometric Testing of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument – Revised (English Version Including a Practice Dimension)

Nurse Media Journal of Nursing · Vol. 11 No. 3 (2021) · hlm. 346–358

DOI
10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.41409
ISSN
2406-8799, 2087-7811
Terbit
2021-12-27
Penerbit
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Background: The middle range theory Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (TCCN) guides nursing practices. The TCCN Instrument (TCCNI) measures perception dimension of the theory and has been revised and translated into the Japanese language (TCCNI-R). Testing the translated version of the TCCNI-R to English language with the inclusion of a practice dimension is warranted.Purpose: This study aims to determine the psychometric properties of the TCCNI-Revised English version with Practice dimension (TCCNI-RePract).Methods: A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted with data from 202 valid questionnaire copies from professional nurses in selected hospitals and nurse educators in universities. Results: The suitability for factor analysis was determined using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index (0.93), Bartlett's sphericity test of 3256.93, p<0.001, the anti-image correlations ranged between 0.87 and 0.96, and an average value of communalities of 0.66. In the four rotations conducted with the maximum likelihood method with a Harris-Kaiser Orthoblique rotation, four items were excluded with factor loadings less than 0.40. These results determined the final scale with 21 items and four subscales, namely: (1) Knowing the person (8 items); (2) Technological competency as Caring (6 items); (3) Technology and caring (4 items); and (4) Expression of nursing as Caring (3 items). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.94. With two dimensions of the TCCNI-RePract, the perception dimension had significantly higher scores than the practice dimension. When comparing mean factor point among the dimensions, the perception scores were significantly higher for Factor 1 and Factor 3.Conclusion:The TCCNI-RePract is an acceptable tool that can reliably measure nurses’ perception and practice of TCCN. It is affirmed that with this tool, measuring perception and practice status of TCCN theory is possible. It is considered that the evaluation results can be used to plan in-hospital education.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

37 penulis · 133 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 63 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Diponegoro University
  • Tokushima University
  • San Beda University
  • Prince of Songkla University
  • Kōchi University
  • St. Luke's Medical Center
  • Takarazuka University of Medical and Health Care
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yoko NakanoKōchi University4
Yoshiyuki TakashimaBaika Women's University4
Kyoko OsakaKōchi University4
Mutsuko KataokaYokufukai Hospital4
Kathyrine A. Calong CalongSan Beda University3
Carissa Juliana BalariaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ryan Michael OducadoWest Visayas State University1
Andrea Beatrice JosefAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hannah Grace PascualAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Antonette Mei SurigaoSan Beda University1
Jemina FuentebellaSan Beda University1
Leana Flordeliza D. AgapitoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alyssa Marielle CortezAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Auryjeena C. FongSan Beda University1
Christiene Jann SanchezAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kittikorn NilmanatPrince of Songkla University1
Megumi Ayagail HoseñaSt. Luke's Medical Center1
Pamela Remle Irish MallorcaSt. Luke's Medical Center1
Yvanna Monique MuyotAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iris Nicole TanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Waraporn KongsuwanPrince of Songkla University1
Barbara Lyn GalvezAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mei Rianita Elfrida SinagaSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Bethesda Yakkum1
Susi Roida SimanjuntakSam Ratulangi University1
Sri Padma SariDiponegoro University1
Diyan Yuli WijayantiDiponegoro University1
Widodo SarjanaDiponegoro University1
Halimah Wenny Yulina AstutiDiponegoro University1
Murti AgustinDiponegoro University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Psychometric Testing of the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument – Revised (English Version Including a Practice Dimension)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Yokotani, Tomoya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Tanioka, Tetsuya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Betriana, Feni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yasuhara, Yuko</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ito, Hirokazu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Soriano, Gil P.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Dino, Michael Joseph</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Locsin, Rozzano C</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Perception; practice dimension; Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing; TCCNI-RePract</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Background: The middle range theory Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (TCCN) guides nursing practices. The TCCN Instrument (TCCNI) measures perception dimension of the theory and has been revised and translated into the Japanese language (TCCNI-R). Testing the translated version of the TCCNI-R to English language with the inclusion of a practice dimension is warranted.Purpose: This study aims to determine the psychometric properties of the TCCNI-Revised English version with Practice dimension (TCCNI-RePract).Methods: A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted with data from 202 valid questionnaire copies from professional nurses in selected hospitals and nurse educators in universities.   Results: The suitability for factor analysis was determined using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index (0.93), Bartlett's sphericity test of 3256.93, p&lt;0.001, the anti-image correlations ranged between 0.87 and 0.96, and an average value of communalities of 0.66. In the four rotations conducted with the maximum likelihood method with a Harris-Kaiser Orthoblique rotation, four items were excluded with factor loadings less than 0.40. These results determined the final scale with 21 items and four subscales, namely: (1) Knowing the person (8 items); (2) Technological competency as Caring (6 items); (3) Technology and caring (4 items); and (4) Expression of nursing as Caring (3 items). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.94. With two dimensions of the TCCNI-RePract, the perception dimension had significantly higher scores than the practice dimension. When comparing mean factor point among the dimensions, the perception scores were significantly higher for Factor 1 and Factor 3.Conclusion:The TCCNI-RePract is an acceptable tool that can reliably measure nurses’ perception and practice of TCCN. It is affirmed that with this tool, measuring perception and practice status of TCCN theory is possible. It is considered that the evaluation results can be used to plan in-hospital education. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-12-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/41409</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.41409</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Nurse Media Journal of Nursing; Vol 11, No 3 (2021): (December 2021); 346-358</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2406-8799</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-7811</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/41409/20713</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>