Akses terbuka
Jurnal
The use of Gijzeling Against Individuals Disobeying Court Orders Qualifying as Contempt of Court
Halu Oleo Law Review (HOLREV)
ISSN 2548-1754, 2548-1762
Terbit 2024-09-28
Penerbit Faculty of Law, Halu Oleo University
Bahasa eng
Abstrak
In Indonesia, as a country of law, all legal subjects are required to comply with court decisions that have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). In civil law, decisions often involve the obligation to pay compensation, and the losing party must fulfill this obligation. However, the implementation of legal certainty can be difficult, and failure to comply with decisions can be considered as contempt of court, which can damage the reputation of the judicial institution and violate Article 216 of the Criminal Code. Although criminal sanctions are applied, the problem of implementing compensation has not been fully resolved. This study uses a normative method with a legislative and conceptual approach to address the problem of ignoring court decisions that have permanent legal force. The results of the study propose that such neglect can be considered as contempt of court and that the concept of “gijzeling” (forced detention) can be used as a bestuursdwang sanction to force the implementation of the decision. The researcher believes that the application of “gijzeling” will be more effective and a solution than criminal sanctions under Article 216 of the Criminal Code in resolving this problem.
Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis
17 penulis ·
55 tautan kepenulisan bersama
· 27 lintas organisasi
Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.
Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://holrev.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal/oai, pertama di-harvest 30 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The use of Gijzeling Against Individuals Disobeying Court Orders Qualifying as Contempt of Court</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Santoso, Bagus Teguh</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Munir, Ahmad</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Azizah, Anisa Kurniatul</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Gijzeling Sanction</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Bestuursdwang</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Contempt of Court</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">In Indonesia, as a country of law, all legal subjects are required to comply with court decisions that have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). In civil law, decisions often involve the obligation to pay compensation, and the losing party must fulfill this obligation. However, the implementation of legal certainty can be difficult, and failure to comply with decisions can be considered as contempt of court, which can damage the reputation of the judicial institution and violate Article 216 of the Criminal Code. Although criminal sanctions are applied, the problem of implementing compensation has not been fully resolved. This study uses a normative method with a legislative and conceptual approach to address the problem of ignoring court decisions that have permanent legal force. The results of the study propose that such neglect can be considered as contempt of court and that the concept of “gijzeling” (forced detention) can be used as a bestuursdwang sanction to force the implementation of the decision. The researcher believes that the application of “gijzeling” will be more effective and a solution than criminal sanctions under Article 216 of the Criminal Code in resolving this problem.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Halu Oleo University</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2024-09-28</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://holrev.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal/article/view/102</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.33561/holrev.v8i2.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Halu Oleo Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Halu Oleo Law Review: Volume 8 Issue 2; 139-167</dc:source>
<dc:source>2548-1754</dc:source>
<dc:source>2548-1762</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.33561/holrev.v8i2</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://holrev.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal/article/view/102/35</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>10.33561/holrev.v8i2.102.g35</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Halu Oleo Law Review</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Sitasi dan pengindeksan
OpenAlex
Tidak ditemukan
Crossref
Tidak ditemukan
Jumlah menurut tiap indeks pada 30 Okt 2026; setiap indeks menghitung sitasi dengan cara berbeda.
Sitasi artikel ini
APA 7
Santoso, B. T., Munir, A., & Azizah, A. K. (2024). The use of Gijzeling Against Individuals Disobeying Court Orders Qualifying as Contempt of Court. Halu Oleo Law Review (HOLREV), 8(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v8i2.102
Salin
IEEE
B. T. Santoso, A. Munir, and A. K. Azizah, “The use of Gijzeling Against Individuals Disobeying Court Orders Qualifying as Contempt of Court,” Halu Oleo Law Review (HOLREV), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 139–167, 2024, doi: 10.33561/holrev.v8i2.102.
Salin
Dibuat dari metadata jurnal; periksa nama penulis sebelum dipakai.