Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Assessment of Interprofessional Education (IPE) in Community Settings: A Systematic Review

Nurse Media Journal of Nursing · Vol. 11 No. 3 (2021) · hlm. 318–335

DOI
10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.34155
ISSN
2406-8799, 2087-7811
Terbit
2021-12-27
Penerbit
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Background: An assessment of methods and tools in interprofessional education (IPE) needs to be conducted to guarantee that the set learning objectives (LOs) or competencies are achieved, especially in community settings. This assessment is essential since in community settings, facilitators and students are not in the same frame, while direct observation is preferable in IPE. The implementation of methods and tools for assessment varies. Mostly, the assessment does not cover all competencies of IPE. Further identification of the way the assessment is conducted as well as the IPE competencies assessed is pivotal.Purpose: This study aimed to review the implementation of IPE in community settings, especially the assessment conducted on the methods and tools used along with the assessors involved and the competencies achieved.Methods: A systematic review was employed as a method in this study. Relevant articles from Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus were screened based on the inclusion criteria: publication between 2010–2020, research and review articles, full-text articles, conducted in community settings, and involved assessment in acquiring the competencies. This review included 12 out of 1,273 screened articles. The articles were analyzed qualitatively by identifying the keywords, categories, and themes.Results: The results showed the assessment conducted and the competencies achieved in IPE. The assessment included methods and tools as well as the assessors involved. Most existing studies used students’ perceptions or reflections as the methods and involved less assessors such as supervisors or family members. Meanwhile, the assessment tools focused on certain competencies, such as roles and responsibilities, ethics and values, teamwork, and communication. However, no study assessed all competencies.Conclusion: The analysis resulted in two large topics, i.e., the assessment, which includes the assessment methods and tools as well as assessors involved, and the competencies achieved. It is recommended to conduct further studies to develop objective assessment methods, comprehensive assessment tools, and generic competencies or learning outcomes.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 133 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 34 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Diponegoro University
  • State University of Semarang
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • International Islamic University Malaysia
  • University of Auckland
  • Universitas Jambi
  • Padjadjaran University
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Gemala AnjaniDiponegoro University6
Ahmad SyauqyDiponegoro University3
Muflihatul MunirohDiponegoro University3
Etika Ratna NoerDiponegoro University2
Nina RestiDiponegoro University2
Adriyan PramonoDiponegoro University2
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang1
Andra NovitasariState University of Semarang1
Miftahul AdnanDiponegoro University1
Hardhono SusantoDiponegoro University1
Sumardi WidodoDiponegoro University1
Maria MexitaliaDiponegoro University1
Irwandi JaswirInternational Islamic University Malaysia1
Lusia Yotista Enggal ParasthiDiponegoro University1
Choirun NissaDiponegoro University1
Binar PanunggalDiponegoro University1
Fillah Fithra DienyDiponegoro University1
Elserinawati SinambelaDiponegoro University1
Hartanti Sandi WijayantiDiponegoro University1
Nuryanto NuryantoDiponegoro University1
Fitriyono AyustaningwarnoDiponegoro University1
Ekowati ChasanahNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Endang Yuli PurwaniNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Fan ZhuUniversity of Auckland1
Dwi HastutiUniversitas Jambi1
Anggorowati AnggorowatiDiponegoro University1
Zubaidah ZubaidahDiponegoro University1
Siti Yuyun Rahayu FitriPadjadjaran University1
Mohammad SulchanDiponegoro University1
Helvi Desi MambayaDiponegoro University1
Nesti RahmawatiDiponegoro University1
Kusmiyati Tjahjono DkDiponegoro University1
Andri Cahyo KumoroDiponegoro University1
Rinta AmaliaDiponegoro University1
Ninik RustantiDiponegoro University1
Pristina Adi RachmawatiDiponegoro University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Assessment of Interprofessional Education (IPE) in Community Settings: A Systematic Review</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Asmara, Fatikhu Yatuni</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kristina, Tri Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Afifah, Diana Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Dewi, Dian Puspita</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Assessment methods; assessment tools; community setting; competencies; Interprofessional Education (IPE)</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Background: An assessment of methods and tools in interprofessional education (IPE) needs to be conducted to guarantee that the set learning objectives (LOs) or competencies are achieved, especially in community settings. This assessment is essential since in community settings, facilitators and students are not in the same frame, while direct observation is preferable in IPE. The implementation of methods and tools for assessment varies. Mostly, the assessment does not cover all competencies of IPE. Further identification of the way the assessment is conducted as well as the IPE competencies assessed is pivotal.Purpose: This study aimed to review the implementation of IPE in community settings, especially the assessment conducted on the methods and tools used along with the assessors involved and the competencies achieved.Methods: A systematic review was employed as a method in this study. Relevant articles from Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus were screened based on the inclusion criteria: publication between 2010–2020, research and review articles, full-text articles, conducted in community settings, and involved assessment in acquiring the competencies. This review included 12 out of 1,273 screened articles. The articles were analyzed qualitatively by identifying the keywords, categories, and themes.Results: The results showed the assessment conducted and the competencies achieved in IPE. The assessment included methods and tools as well as the assessors involved. Most existing studies used students’ perceptions or reflections as the methods and involved less assessors such as supervisors or family members. Meanwhile, the assessment tools focused on certain competencies, such as roles and responsibilities, ethics and values, teamwork, and communication. However, no study assessed all competencies.Conclusion: The analysis resulted in two large topics, i.e., the assessment, which includes the assessment methods and tools as well as assessors involved, and the competencies achieved. It is recommended to conduct further studies to develop objective assessment methods, comprehensive assessment tools, and generic competencies or learning outcomes.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-12-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/34155</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.34155</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Nurse Media Journal of Nursing; Vol 11, No 3 (2021): (December 2021); 318-335</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2406-8799</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-7811</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/34155/20725</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Nurse Media Journal of Nursing</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>