Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Beyond Colonial Archives: Decolonizing Indonesian Islamic Historiography Through Epistemic Pluralism

QIJIS (Qudus International Journal Of Islamic Studies) · Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 139–174

DOI
10.21043/qijis.v14i1.34563
ISSN
2476-9304, 2355-1895
Terbit
2026-08-30
Penerbit
IAIN Kudus
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This article examines the relationship between colonialism, capitalism, and orientalism in the historiography of Indonesian Islam and the impact they continue to have on contemporary Islamic Studies. Although colonialism and capitalism have been heavily criticized in the past for their bearing on contemporary knowledge production, they have been neglected in knowledge-based research on Indonesian Islamic intellectual traditions, which are regarded as legitimate sources of knowledge. In this research, we applied a qualitative approach that takes into account critical archival analysis of two important British colonial texts, The History of Java (1817) and The History of Sumatra (1783), and the semi-structured interviews conducted with scholars at SOAS University of London, University of Oxford, and University of Birmingham. We found that colonial epistemic hierarchies still exist in academic institutions, and that the systems of archival authority, publishing practices, citation politics, and the production and validation of theory each have their own mechanisms. Rather than examining colonialism, capitalism, and orientalism as separate historical processes, we thought of them as jointly constitutive structural actors that influence the production and circulation of knowledge in Islam. As a result, Indonesian Islamic intellectual traditions, including pesantren epistemologies, oral transmission, and local knowledge of intellectual practices, are valuable tools for epistemic pluralism and the decolonization of Islamic historiography. The article argues that decolonizing Islamic historiography, beyond postcolonial critique, is about epistemic reconstruction, in which Indonesian Islamic intellectual practices are seen not only as empirical objects of study but also as legitimate sources of conceptual and theoretical innovation. The study contributes to contemporary Islamic studies by bringing together colonialism, capitalism, and orientalism as interrelated frameworks and by positioning Indonesian Islamic historiography as a plural and generative site of knowledge creation.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

3 penulis · 3 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/QIJIS/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Beyond Colonial Archives: Decolonizing Indonesian Islamic Historiography Through Epistemic Pluralism</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Masud, Abdurrahman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ernada, Sus Eko Zuhri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Said, Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Islamic Histories</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Decolonial Historiography, Indonesian Islam, Coloniality of Knowledge, Epistemic Justice, Epistemic Pluralism.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This article examines the relationship between colonialism, capitalism, and orientalism in the historiography of Indonesian Islam and the impact they continue to have on contemporary Islamic Studies. Although colonialism and capitalism have been heavily criticized in the past for their bearing on contemporary knowledge production, they have been neglected in knowledge-based research on Indonesian Islamic intellectual traditions, which are regarded as legitimate sources of knowledge. In this research, we applied a qualitative approach that takes into account critical archival analysis of two important British colonial texts, The History of Java (1817) and The History of Sumatra (1783), and the semi-structured interviews conducted with scholars at SOAS University of London, University of Oxford, and University of Birmingham. We found that colonial epistemic hierarchies still exist in academic institutions, and that the systems of archival authority, publishing practices, citation politics, and the production and validation of theory each have their own mechanisms. Rather than examining colonialism, capitalism, and orientalism as separate historical processes, we thought of them as jointly constitutive structural actors that influence the production and circulation of knowledge in Islam. As a result, Indonesian Islamic intellectual traditions, including pesantren epistemologies, oral transmission, and local knowledge of intellectual practices, are valuable tools for epistemic pluralism and the decolonization of Islamic historiography. The article argues that decolonizing Islamic historiography, beyond postcolonial critique, is about epistemic reconstruction, in which Indonesian Islamic intellectual practices are seen not only as empirical objects of study but also as legitimate sources of conceptual and theoretical innovation. The study contributes to contemporary Islamic studies by bringing together colonialism, capitalism, and orientalism as interrelated frameworks and by positioning Indonesian Islamic historiography as a plural and generative site of knowledge creation.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">IAIN Kudus</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US">MoRA</dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2026-08-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/QIJIS/article/view/34563</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.21043/qijis.v14i1.34563</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id-ID">QIJIS; Vol 14, No 1 (2026); 139-174</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies); Vol 14, No 1 (2026); 139-174</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2476-9304</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2355-1895</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.21043/qijis.v14i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>http://journal.stainkudus.ac.id/index.php/QIJIS/article/view/34563/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>