Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Fuzzy Logic As A Tool For Estimating Production Potential Of A Sand Layer

Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas · Vol. 27 No. 3 (2022) · hlm. 3–11

DOI
10.29017/SCOG.27.3.872
ISSN
2541-0520, 2089-3361
Terbit
2022-03-30
Penerbit
Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

In production management, a prior knowledge over production potential of a candidate sand layer (geological complexity in Indonesia has led to existence of stratified reservoirs with a set of layers) to be opened is always desirable. The common practice performed during drilling and completion activities of a production well is through the use of well testing and fluid sampling. From the test, fluid dynamic data such as total liquid rate, water cut, and gas cut are produced. A similar set of data is also required for more mature fields for the purpose of monitoring through the running of routine production and/or swab tests.Although the tests, especially flow tests during drilling and completion, are always regarded as the only source of proof about productive layer(s) production potential, an alternative means that can be used to provide estimates is always desired. The main reason is that flow tests are costly so that only layer(s) considered as the most potential are to be assigned for testing. Layer(s) that are considered less potential are left untested, eventhough in some cases they are also set on production during the well's production phase.The idea of establishing a method that can provide illustration over production potentials of all layer(s) always exists. Certainly, there are approaches to serve the purpose such as productivity index (PI) analogy and petrophysical through fractional flow measurement in a core laboratory. However, those approaches are often considered inadequate in accommodating various factors that may influence production potential.To materialize the idea stated above, the pattern recognition approach was taken. This approach was taken in order to model the relationships between various fac- tors in wellbore and production potential without being trapped by the certain complexity that occurs in any mathematical expressions trying to explain the relationships. For the purpose, fuzzy logie (a branch in ArtificialIntelligence) has been used. The choice is actually based on its ability to accommodate both numeric and non-numeric data. Some non-numeric data such as lithology and pore system also have some degrees of influence on production potential. With a tool that enables us to have production potential estimates of reservoir layers, from which layers with the most promising potential are taken to undergo flow tests. Furthermore, as flow test data has been acquired and used as feedback and calibration by the fuzzy model, production potential of layer(s) with less promising or ambiguous prospect can also be predicted.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 124 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Hasanuddin University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Kosasih KosasihAfiliasi tidak diketahui6
Suliantara SuliantaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Junita Trivianty MusuAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Suprajitno MunadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Tri Muji SusantoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Aan AsphiantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Khairan ARUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry2
Mira MaisuraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mujamilah MujamilahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Herru Lastiadi SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Merkurius F MendrofaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sugihardjo SugihardjoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Djoko SunarjantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Herru L SetiawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mohamad RomliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Diana DwiyanartiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Herizal HerizalAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aziz M LubadAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Nurkamelia NurkameliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sunting KepiesAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Junita T MusuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Aulia Syarif AzizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad IchsanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aminur AminurUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Abd. Rahman KadirUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Makkarennu MakkarennuHasanuddin University1
Sri wahyuni HarisHasanuddin University1
Hibnu NugrohoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Austin Al HarizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ma'ruf Pambudi NurwantaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Farchan Arif RosadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kania Mulia UtamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aliyth PrakarsaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anas Aditya WijanarkoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad Ghifari AlhasaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Fuzzy Logic As A Tool For Estimating Production Potential Of A Sand Layer</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Widarsono, Bambang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Atmoko, Heru</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Saptono, Fakhriyadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Tunggal, Tunggal</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ridwan, Ridwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">production</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">potential</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sand Layer</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">In production management, a prior knowledge over production potential of a candidate sand layer (geological complexity in Indonesia has led to existence of stratified reservoirs with a set of layers) to be opened is always desirable. The common practice performed during drilling and completion activities of a production well is through the use of well testing and fluid sampling. From the test, fluid dynamic data such as total liquid rate, water cut, and gas cut are produced. A similar set of data is also required for more mature fields for the purpose of monitoring through the running of routine production and/or swab tests.Although the tests, especially flow tests during drilling and completion, are always regarded as the only source of proof about productive layer(s) production potential, an alternative means that can be used to provide estimates is always desired. The main reason is that flow tests are costly so that only layer(s) considered as the most potential are to be assigned for testing. Layer(s) that are considered less potential are left untested, eventhough in some cases they are also set on production during the well's production phase.The idea of establishing a method that can provide illustration over production potentials of all layer(s) always exists. Certainly, there are approaches to serve the purpose such as productivity index (PI) analogy and petrophysical through fractional flow measurement in a core laboratory. However, those approaches are often considered inadequate in accommodating various factors that may influence production potential.To materialize the idea stated above, the pattern recognition approach was taken. This approach was taken in order to model the relationships between various fac- tors in wellbore and production potential without being trapped by the certain complexity that occurs in any mathematical expressions trying to explain the relationships. For the purpose, fuzzy logie (a branch in ArtificialIntelligence) has been used. The choice is actually based on its ability to accommodate both numeric and non-numeric data. Some non-numeric data such as lithology and pore system also have some degrees of influence on production potential. With a tool that enables us to have production potential estimates of reservoir layers, from which layers with the most promising potential are taken to undergo flow tests. Furthermore, as flow test data has been acquired and used as feedback and calibration by the fuzzy model, production potential of layer(s) with less promising or ambiguous prospect can also be predicted.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-03-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/article/view/872</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29017/SCOG.27.3.872</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2004); 3-11</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas; Vol 27 No 3 (2004); 3-11</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-0520</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-3361</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/article/view/872/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 1970 SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS OIL AND GAS (SCOG)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>