Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

ROLE OF CO2 GAS EMISSION TAX ON FOSSIL FUEL IN REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT “A PERSPECTIVE FOR INDONESIA”

Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas · Vol. 30 No. 2 (2022) · hlm. 24–32

DOI
10.29017/SCOG.30.2.982
ISSN
2541-0520, 2089-3361
Terbit
2022-03-29
Penerbit
Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

In the year 2001, Indonesia was ranked 21st in producing CO2 emissions. In 1990 thetotal emission of CO2 from the burning of fossil fuel was estimated at 83.8 million tonnesand by the end of the year 2020 the total emissions are estimated to be 368.3 milliontonnes. Currently, Indonesia has no specific regulation in place for controlling CO2 emissionseither in the form of an act or government regulation.Some approaches in controlling such emissions are through “common and control”and or “market based instrument” (sometimes this term is called “economic instrument”).Based on experience from developed countries, economic instrument in the form of carbontax or emission tax is preferred due to it’s effectiveness compared with the commonand control instrument.This empirical study is intended to analyze the role of economic instrument in the formof a carbon or emission tax on the energy of fossil fuel through a modified DICE (DynamicIntegrated Model of Climate Change and the Economy). The DICE model is alsocalled a “Three –Box Model” or “Two Folded Model”By using some rate of social preference (R), the model outcome suggests that appropriateoptimal taxes for petrol and coal are if model using R value of 5%. Value of carbon taxper ton in optimal condition for period of 1990-2019 is within the range $US3.90 – 40.35or $US1.06 -11.00 USD CO2 per ton. The price is equivalent to $US 0.002 – 0.024 perliter petrol and $US 1.95 -20.25 per ton coal.Based on the model output it is indicated that carbon or emission tax with optimalscenario has no significant impact on income per capita relative to “Base Case”. Shouldthe government apply tax instruments with optimal scenario, revenue of emission taxes willfall between $US 457.6 – 2,362.8 million for period 1990-2019. The revenue consists of$US 376.1 – 1,585.6 million generated from petrol and $US 81.4 – 777.2 million fromcoal.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

25 penulis · 54 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 15 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • IPB University
  • Lampung University
  • Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang
  • Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
  • Universitas Sahid Jakarta
  • Southeast Asian Regional Centre for Tropical Biology
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ernan RustiadiIPB University3
Baba BarusIPB University3
Bambang JuandaIPB University2
Ardiyanto Maksimilianus GaiInstitut Teknologi Nasional Malang2
Asti IstiqomahIPB University1
Sri MulatsihIPB University1
Nuva NuvaIPB University1
Pini WijayantiIPB University1
Dessy RachmawatieMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Dedi Budiman HakimIPB University1
Dedy YuliawanLampung University1
Tri Ratna SaridewiIPB University1
Setia HadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
I Wayan RusastraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nafiah AriyaniUniversitas Sahid Jakarta1
SULISTIJORINI RINIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
ZAINAL ALIM MASUDAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Soekisman TjitrosemitoSoutheast Asian Regional Centre for Tropical Biology1
Nizar NasrullahIPB University1
Bustanul ArifinLampung University1
Tiara Aprilia Putri HernandaIPB University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">ROLE OF CO2 GAS EMISSION TAX ON FOSSIL FUEL IN REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT “A PERSPECTIVE FOR INDONESIA”</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fachruddin, Kemas</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fauzi, Akhmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Bey, Ahmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Surtjahjo, Surjono H</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Carbon/emission tax</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">abatement cost and common &amp; control.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">In the year 2001, Indonesia was ranked 21st in producing CO2 emissions. In 1990 thetotal emission of CO2 from the burning of fossil fuel was estimated at 83.8 million tonnesand by the end of the year 2020 the total emissions are estimated to be 368.3 milliontonnes. Currently, Indonesia has no specific regulation in place for controlling CO2 emissionseither in the form of an act or government regulation.Some approaches in controlling such emissions are through “common and control”and or “market based instrument” (sometimes this term is called “economic instrument”).Based on experience from developed countries, economic instrument in the form of carbontax or emission tax is preferred due to it’s effectiveness compared with the commonand control instrument.This empirical study is intended to analyze the role of economic instrument in the formof a carbon or emission tax on the energy of fossil fuel through a modified DICE (DynamicIntegrated Model of Climate Change and the Economy). The DICE model is alsocalled a “Three –Box Model” or “Two Folded Model”By using some rate of social preference (R), the model outcome suggests that appropriateoptimal taxes for petrol and coal are if model using R value of 5%. Value of carbon taxper ton in optimal condition for period of 1990-2019 is within the range $US3.90 – 40.35or $US1.06 -11.00 USD CO2 per ton. The price is equivalent to $US 0.002 – 0.024 perliter petrol and $US 1.95 -20.25 per ton coal.Based on the model output it is indicated that carbon or emission tax with optimalscenario has no significant impact on income per capita relative to “Base Case”. Shouldthe government apply tax instruments with optimal scenario, revenue of emission taxes willfall between $US 457.6 – 2,362.8 million for period 1990-2019. The revenue consists of$US 376.1 – 1,585.6 million generated from petrol and $US 81.4 – 777.2 million fromcoal.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-03-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/article/view/982</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29017/SCOG.30.2.982</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas; Vol. 30 No. 2 (2007); 24-32</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas; Vol 30 No 2 (2007); 24-32</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-0520</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-3361</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/article/view/982/774</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 1970 SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS OIL AND GAS (SCOG)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>