Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Seismic Data Processing and Seismic Inversion in The Ray Parameter Domain: Common Reflection Point (CRP) Stack and Ray Impedance

Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas · Vol. 47 No. 2 (2024) · hlm. 129–139

DOI
10.29017/SCOG.47.2.1621
ISSN
2541-0520, 2089-3361
Terbit
2024-08-01
Penerbit
Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Reservoir characterization can be enhanced by integrating lateral and vertical perspectives from seismic surveys and well logging, respectively. Seismic impedance is a crucial parameter, calculated by multiplying the rock density by the primary (P) wave velocity. While acoustic impedance solely considers these two factors, elastic impedance incorporates additional angular measurements and secondary (S) wave velocity data. Elastic impedance, however, equates the incident angle with the transmission angle in disregard of Snell's law; therefore, it provides a simplified representation of seismic impedance. This study explores an alternative approach to seismic impedance, known as ray impedance. We calculated ray impedance by tracing the impedance variation along the path of a seismic ray, considering its changing velocity and angle as it traveled through different subsurface strata. We transformed the seismic information from the offset space to the ray parameter space, to achieve ray parameter stacking. Unlike the traditional angle domain inversion, which uses near-angle, mid-angle, and far-angle seismic stack data, the ray-impedance inversion utilized segments of ray data: near-ray, mid-ray, and far-ray. We compared the common depth point stack, ray stack, and angle stack methods to infer the acoustic, elastic, and ray impedance characteristics. Challenges with gas cloud interference in seismic data imaging were present. We developed a ray parameter strategy to address these imaging difficulties. The comparison of different stacking techniques indicated that ray stacking could offer an alternative for imaging in the presence of gas cloud effects. Furthermore, impedance cross-plotting demonstrated that ray impedance provided a more discernible separation of low-clay-content zones than elastic impedance did. Overall, data processing in the ray parameter domain yielded positive imaging outcomes in the presence of gas clouds, suggesting that ray impedance is a practical method for lithological differentiation

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

22 penulis · 54 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Respati Yogyakarta
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Lucky Kriski MuhtarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Sri LestariUniversitas Respati Yogyakarta2
Supriyono SupriyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Firman Saifuddin AkbarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Benny Eza YusufAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Donny MirazaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
S. SupriyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Awali PriyonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hilman MardiyanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fatkhan FatkhanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jefri B. IrawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Natasha C. VionyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sunawar KunaifiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hikhmadhan GultafAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Benyamin SapiieAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Meli HadianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yehezkiel HalauwetAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Herlina Almanda Anna Maria NarwadanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fernando Lawrens HutapeaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Seismic Data Processing and Seismic Inversion in The Ray Parameter Domain: Common Reflection Point (CRP) Stack and Ray Impedance</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Triyoso, Wahyu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sinaga, Edycakra Immanuel</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Oktariena, Madaniya</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">acoustic impedance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">elastic impedance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">ray impedance</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Reservoir characterization can be enhanced by integrating lateral and vertical perspectives from seismic surveys and well logging, respectively. Seismic impedance is a crucial parameter, calculated by multiplying the rock density by the primary (P) wave velocity. While acoustic impedance solely considers these two factors, elastic impedance incorporates additional angular measurements and secondary (S) wave velocity data. Elastic impedance, however, equates the incident angle with the transmission angle in disregard of Snell's law; therefore, it provides a simplified representation of seismic impedance. This study explores an alternative approach to seismic impedance, known as ray impedance. We calculated ray impedance by tracing the impedance variation along the path of a seismic ray, considering its changing velocity and angle as it traveled through different subsurface strata. We transformed the seismic information from the offset space to the ray parameter space, to achieve ray parameter stacking. Unlike the traditional angle domain inversion, which uses near-angle, mid-angle, and far-angle seismic stack data, the ray-impedance inversion utilized segments of ray data: near-ray, mid-ray, and far-ray. We compared the common depth point stack, ray stack, and angle stack methods to infer the acoustic, elastic, and ray impedance characteristics. Challenges with gas cloud interference in seismic data imaging were present. We developed a ray parameter strategy to address these imaging difficulties. The comparison of different stacking techniques indicated that ray stacking could offer an alternative for imaging in the presence of gas cloud effects. Furthermore, impedance cross-plotting demonstrated that ray impedance provided a more discernible separation of low-clay-content zones than elastic impedance did. Overall, data processing in the ray parameter domain yielded positive imaging outcomes in the presence of gas clouds, suggesting that ray impedance is a practical method for lithological differentiation</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Testing Center for Oil and Gas LEMIGAS</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-08-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/article/view/1621</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.29017/SCOG.47.2.1621</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas; Vol. 47 No. 2 (2024); 129-139</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas; Vol 47 No 2 (2024); 129-139</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-0520</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-3361</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.lemigas.esdm.go.id/index.php/SCOG/article/view/1621/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 © Copyright by Authors. Published by LEMIGAS</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>